All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The modern workplace is akin to a giant machine, one built up of many moving parts and components joined together in a delicate balance. The workings of that machine are best known to those who's day to day tasks are caring for and ensuring the contnued productivity of that machine. To bring in an outside hand to dictate the workers on how to solve issues would inevitably lead to discord.
A worker who's day involves solving ever arising issues knows best the delicate manuevering that takes. Hiring a consultant that would charge the company exorbitant fees to solve an issue or increase productivity would have short-term benefits but will more often than not serve as nothing more than a band-aid. If a company were to look inwards for the solution to their problems, employees would be more comfortable coming forward with solutions, which would save fees and open up channels of communication between management and the workforce. Increased efficiency and profit are a great motivator for businesses and employees will work towards these goals if they see that their contributions are appreciated.
By spending time to hear the complaints and suggestions of the employees who are at the forefront of any issue or task, the wealth of knowledge gained by any one employee would be shared and circulated throughout the companyand can eventually serve as a guide or template for particular tasks. This can also open up routes for promotionm, which would endear the workers ever more to the cpmpany and show that their input is noticed and can be rewarded. Many senior management staff and executives were once at the bottom of the ladder, but through the recognition of their skills and creatitvity were able to rise to the top. In 2021 during a shareholders meeting Amazon executives brought on state two warehouse workers who had saved the company millions of dollars in time saved after they suggested a more efficient way for the workers to retrieve items from shelves. Such ingenuity can only come from within the ranks of a company.
An argument can be made that a contractor would save time and lend an outside perspective and solution not open to the employees. This must be weighed against the cost of such serveices to determine if it is the best course of action, and research has shown that it not always is. Many contractors take advantage of the dependence these companies come to have on them and abuse the power given to them.
In 2020 a Nigerian company Alpha Beta that had been brought in to solve the tax collection issues of the Lagos state government was accused of overcharging for basic services rendered.
A reasonable compromise must be met bwween an organization and its workers on the appropriate and best time to look outside for help. This must come after all internal avenues have been exhausted or in a great emergency which no one in house is equipped to solve. This would boost overall morale, retention rates and workplace satisfaction
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 50 | view |
- In any field field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make meaningful contributions 83
- In all levels of education affection should be focused first on theory in order for students to understand the concepts rather than practical s to what extent do you agree or disagree 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 58
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 83
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...of that machine are best known to those whos day to day tasks are caring for and ens...
^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...inevitably lead to discord. A worker whos day involves solving ever arising issue...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2482.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9246031746 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71670967603 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521825396825 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4013614499 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.631578947 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5263157895 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.78947368421 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321824579195 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797483328473 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674143323118 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138724080882 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923206459778 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...of that machine are best known to those whos day to day tasks are caring for and ens...
^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...inevitably lead to discord. A worker whos day involves solving ever arising issue...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2482.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9246031746 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71670967603 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521825396825 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4013614499 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.631578947 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5263157895 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.78947368421 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321824579195 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797483328473 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674143323118 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138724080882 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923206459778 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.