All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Though employees tend to know the ins and outs of their company's operations better than any outsider, it takes expertise in business economics and even industrial psychology to effectively utilize such information in the process of improving efficiency.
Any given employee can give details about a few individual issues in a company, but this information needs to be aggregated and handed over to an expert analyst who can then give sound advice on resolving these, sometimes in a more comprehensive manner than one might initially think. Most companies already have a means of collecting feedback from employees; this is often not enough by itself, though, even if the task of resolving issues is handed off to managers. Managers are typically not trained or educated to resolve company-wide inefficiencies, which tend to extend outside their scope of management. Furthermore, even if they have complete control over an issue, if it is a matter of industrial psychology, their knowledge is almost certain to be too limited. That is why such expert consultants exist. They can take the amount of time necessary to look over all the information that's been gathered -- time that most managers don't have. They can apply the tools they've learned just for this process of increasing operative efficiency -- tools that most managers don't have.
It is often the case that even when employees themselves think they know the solution to a problem, they actually don't. For example, a study was conducted where random persons where asked to taste two cakes. Each cake was actually identical, but persons were told one was more expensive than the other. After tasting, they were asked which tasted better. Despite the cakes actually being the same, people almost invariably said the more expensive cake tasted better. The point here is that people frequently fail to identify their own biases. There are piles more of evidence from studies like this suggesting that it can be very difficult to identify a solution to a given problem that is intimately tied to things like satisfaction, stress, or even social or physical comfort. As a result, industrial psychologists, being aware of this, offer a very clear, objective perspective on such matters. They can offer solutions that actually address the underlying problems in a given work environment. Another example is that psychologists found painting the inside walls of a building pink make people more calm. That coudl be useful to some compai
It is apparent to anyone who has worked pretty much anywhere for an extended time that companies have inefficient practices. Often, what is not truly apparent is how to resolve these into more efficient practices. To this end, there exist various experts offering consultation services which are actually needed to cut through the noise and see with fresh, well-informed eyes how to approach these problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 42
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Though employees tend to know the ins an...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he process of improving efficiency. Any given employee can give details abou...
^^^
Line 3, column 894, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...essary to look over all the information thats been gathered -- time that most manager...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 941, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...een gathered -- time that most managers dont have. They can apply the tools theyve l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 977, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...ers dont have. They can apply the tools theyve learned just for this process of increa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1077, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... efficiency -- tools that most managers dont have. It is often the case that ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tools that most managers dont have. It is often the case that even when empl...
^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he solution to a problem, they actually dont. For example, a study was conducted whe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... That coudl be useful to some compai It is apparent to anyone who has worked ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, look, so, then, well, even so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20085470085 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76181031162 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 774.9 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3721549595 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.904761905 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223218294794 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622764804023 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033990906263 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127828249281 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239954862208 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.8971910112 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.