Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement mentions that technology like internet and videos can distract students from learning which is understandable; however, we cannot remove these innovations from schools to stop or reduce the distraction. Every student has a choice to use it for learning or for entertainment.
First of all, we definitely cannot ignore the numerous positive learning consequences by using technology. Imagine a country, Iran, where there was not internet to help students to understand textbook contents. Consider how much easier it could be for students to study with innovations like teaching websites and not just textbooks. Technology can bring an opportunity for teachers to teach their concepts better and deeper.
Additionally, every student in any stage of school level is going to use technology to study and to learn something. Depending on the concept everybody can study better and faster by using different modernization methods. For example, it is easier for some students to understand textbooks’ concepts by reading different articles, research papers and online flash cards, but some students are more comfortable to learn with watching videos and movies. No matter what is the teaching concept and how students are able to learn, an innovation like Internet has brought a lot of ways for teachers to teach more efficient and for students to learn deeper.
However, some people believe that unlimited use of Internet can be a distraction in schools. Obviously, students who spend their time playing video games, and checking their Facebook cannot focus on their studying; however, we cannot blame the technology. There are always two sides of technology which can be positive or negative. Students who choose to use those technologies for studying purpose are able to learn. On the other hand, students who use an internet for entertainment can slow down their learning. In addition, schools can easily install especial programs to filter Facebook.
Students should use innovations like Internet and videos which can definitely improve their learning and give them extra help from different online websites to learn deeper. In case of distraction, schools can have regulation programs to guide and monitor students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 62
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, for example, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42816091954 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85948707575 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1989222506 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.944444444 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245032306553 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892890107697 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665112408718 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176247142285 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679316776472 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.