Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet offer schools improved method for instructing students. It is not correct that technologies all too often distract from real learning because it depends on how an individual makes use of such innovations.
It is the responsibility of individuals to make proper use of innovations. For instance, the students should use innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet to improve their learning as these innovations help students in many ways like clarifying their doubts and in easily understanding any concept taught by their school teachers. Students can make use of those innovations for learning concepts which are not taught by their school teachers. Teachers should take care that students will not use Internet and computer for purposes other than education when they are teaching online. Teachers should monitor the students for this purpose and they should educate students in making effective use of these innovations for their intellectual development.
It is true that students cannot really learn by simply making use of these above technologies. Students has to make effort from his/her side to real learn anything like understanding the concept, memorizing the concept and answering the questions related to that concept. However, if student makes proper use of these technologies, then it would students a lot in their real learning. For instance, take an example of a student studying science subject, the students can understand the concept clearly when he watches the video related to that concept. When the student clearly understands the concept, he/she can memorize it very easily.
It is true that these above technologies distract students from learning, but it is not the fault of these technologies for distracting students. If the student does not have any interest to study, then the student will get distracted by many things like playing games or talking unnecessary things with their friends. If the student knows the value of time and education, then the student will not get distracted by using these innovations for their education purpose.
Innovations such as video, computers, and Internet offers schools improved methods for instructing students. If the students and teachers are responsible while using these innovations for their education purpose, then these technologies cannot distract from real learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets Specifically dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease In light of these findings Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership wi 55
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 55
- The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enrolled in our public schools will soon decrease dramatically and we can safely reduce the funds budgeted for educat 60
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, then, while, as to, for instance, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49329758713 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87558477078 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428954423592 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6701869879 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.529411765 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342926357821 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148008656141 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957831503215 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260332475201 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114010488238 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.