In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Sachin Tendulkar, Mahatma Gandhi, Aryabhatt, these are the name of some highly successful people who made a significant contribution in their fields and were the first ones to achieve a prominent position for their work. As history claims, as no one achieved such a position prior them in their respective fields, they had no one to look up to who achieved success in their field. They might have had some role models but certainly not from the same field then too their contribution is impeccable.
Mahatma Gandhi, Father of India, has faced the situations that were horrifying still he dealt with every problem, kept India unite, nobody had done something like that before. His contribution in making India a free country is beyond words. He had on one to follow, no one to get influenced by as there was no one who had such sort of achievement still he managed to do it because he was focused, he knew what he wanted and he kept on moving in that direction.
It is good to have somebody who has already done well in the field of your interest but it is not mandatory. Having known somebody would definitely increase boast your moral but without it also you can achieve whatever you want to achieve in life.
History is full of such examples. I think you can do anything that you set your mind to.
The right approach, concentration and hard work are the important and mandatory requirements to contribute in the field of your interest. I think the argument undermines the importance of all the otehr factors responsible for success. I strongly disagree and would assert that it is always a first time for somebody somewhere and history is created by those who do somthing for the first time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, still, then, well, i think, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72147651007 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6211748573 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557046979866 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2432375948 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.230769231 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183334040589 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638658950278 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507208395454 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868782868667 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588337180636 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.