In any field, if one is willing to put in lots of effort and overcome all the challenges they face during the process, they can have a chance to make important contributions, whether they start as a beginner or an expert. The prompt claims that a beginner is more likely to make important contributions in any field. However, I strongly disagree with this prompt for three reasons.
First of all, a beginner does not have sufficient experience or fundamental knowledge of the field. It can be difficult enough for a beginner to learn and understand the basics, let alone the difficulties of making new discoveries. For instance, if a person has just started to learn chemistry, all they know about chemistry are the basic features of some common chemical elements. It would be almost impossible for them to synthesize a new material that provides lots of convenient uses in daily life and benefits thousands of people, since they have little experience conducting experiments or applying theories during the process. Therefore, due to the lack of experience and basic knowledge, it is less likely for a beginner to make contributions.
Secondly, a beginner is not familiar enough with the field to know what discoveries or studies have already been done. In other words, a beginner may accidentally discover something new to themselves, but ultimately learn that what they have found was not something new. For example, if there was a kid who likes plants a lot and has some basic knowledge about plants, they found a kind of plant that they have never seen in a forest. They took the plant home, thought excitedly that they might have just discovered a new species. However, after doing some research themselves, they found out that the plant had already been discovered a long time ago. A beginner usually does not know what part of the field has already been studied and has no idea about which part of the field has more potential value to be studied. Hence, it is difficult for beginners to contribute greatly in a field.
Furthermore, an expert knows more peers in the same field with whom they can discuss their work. When people discuss their work with others, they can help each other spot mistakes and get useful advice. For example, professors at universities often collaborate with their colleagues to conduct research. In the same field, there could be many different branches, and it is not possible for a person to be knowledgeable about all of them. Thus, it would be helpful to have someone familiar with different topics but in the same field to provide professional advice. Since an expert can discuss their work with other experts and receive advice to improve their work, they are more likely to make significant contributions.
However, some might argue that a beginner could give some valuable outsider points of view. However, without an expert’s examination, we cannot know if this new idea is really practical or worthless. Hence, in my point of view, experts are more likely to make important contributions to a field than beginners.
- Your professor is teaching a class on political science Write a post responding to the professor s question In your response you should express and support your personal opinion make a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response 11
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company s president In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their wor 58
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developersin the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazzclub is 65 miles away thu 65
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...arch. In the same field, there could be many different branches, and it is not possible for a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2559.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95930232558 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76128652861 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470930232558 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4921357103 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70833333333 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203885451471 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075666734757 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686418942521 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132181157889 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447702512199 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.