In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should
step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most
compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Although it is true that some CEOs or people in higher positions in different fields would tend to let other people take over their positions, it is too extreme to say that any professions leaders should step down after five years. We need to consider different circumstances in different fields.
On the one hand, there’s no doubt to claim that some powerful people in the political field would need to step down after several years. For example, the president of the country has always been the most powerful leader to guide all citizens toward a better future. Even though it seems reasonable for a leader who does not want to step down after a few years, sometimes it could lead to adverse effects on the nation. The president of Pakistan stayed in his position for several years, but he refused to step down when it was the end of his term; his decision made a riot among citizens since they were separated in two parts, one part supported the president, the other against his continued presidency. Two parties fight against each other and even killed innocence during the fighting, which affected Pakistan’s economy and security. Therefore, sometimes if the powerful people of the country do not step down after years, it would lead to dangerous situations within the country.
On the other hand, if we put this claim in the business field, it might be untenable to ensure that the change of professions would be better for the company. Some people might argue that the change of leaders is necessary since younger people are more creative than them, and they would create a better future for the company. However, it’s not always been the truth; for example, Steve Jobs as Apple’s CEO and original creator of the company, never loses his creativity through his term. From iPhone to iPad, in Jobs’ term more than five years, he made so many benefits for Apple for being creative. His achievements shocked all people around the world since without him we would never use touch screen phones in that early time. If Apple’s leader changed, people might never see the new changes of the iPhone and iPad. Consequently, sometimes the step down of a leader in business is unnecessary since new leaders might not do better afterward.
Besides, if we consider this situation in the education field, it’s also disputable to say that the step down of powerful people would benefit the profession. To authenticate the power and achievement of the leader, we need to know their students that a professional leader in education is an excellent teacher. Fostering another professional takes time, so if the education leader steps down after five years, he will lose time to cultivate others. For instance, Confucius as a great leader in the education field in the past, his students were those who passed his philosophy and knowledge around the world, and Confucius cultivated them<span class="hiddenGrammarError"></span> for more than five years. Their achievements brought significant benefits for the whole world, so without the long-term cultivation of students, the leader in educations would not present their power.
All in all, although in politics field the change of powerful people in the country would be better for its development, in business and education fields it would be inconvincible to claim that since leaders in these fields would keep up their power to lead these fields to bright futures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'been'.
Suggestion: been always
...for the company. However, it's not always been the truth; for example, Steve Jobs as A...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2904.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10369068541 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09549259916 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451669595782 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 876.6 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4389155969 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.285714286 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0952380952 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38095238095 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116030759463 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432302494055 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354626583702 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757365360973 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259827740721 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.