In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
We live in an ever-changing time, where progress is characterized by those who take action towards an issue to lessen the discrimination of a given community. Movements such as the Feminist or Women’s movement of the 1960s and ’70s has inspired the discussion of social issues women have faced and continue to face to this day, sparking following movements such as the Me Too movement. These discussions have allowed progress to be made in a male-dominating society that is opposing our views. It is recommended by the prompt, that in order for progress to occur in given situations, conversation amongst people with opposing views should be required. In my opinion, I strongly agree that progress requires discussion among people with contrasting views in order to understand why these individuals have the mindsets that they do and I list two reasons as to how assists in doing so.
To begin, we live in a time of fear due to the global pandemic we are facing of the Coronavirus or COVID-19. Many people have lost their businesses, are unemployed, and have had family members fall ill and die all in relation to this virus. The decisions made for the future and safety of this nation are in the hands of the two political parties, the Republican and Democratic parties. Many Republicans believe that states should reopen their businesses as people are losing the money with each passing day that is needed to provide for their families. On the other hand, many Democrats wish to extend the Stay-At-Home orders in place as the virus is still a present threat that is killing millions of Americans. It’s imperative that these two parties should discuss amongst each other why they stand with their opinion, in order to make progress in assisting the American people during the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of 1928 as well as the safety of our nation, as there are consequences we will face until a vaccine is created.
Furthermore, our nation is belittling the efforts of frontline healthcare workers, and blaming them for the rapid spread of infection of this virus. In Russia, two healthcare workers fell out of buildings and were suspiciously assumed to commit suicide due to the deaths and terrors this virus has presented. Across the globe, doctors, nurses, and so forth have been brutally attacked for doing their jobs. Many are frustrated with how the virus is being handled across regions, and are taking out their frustrations on anyone they can put the blame on. This example demonstrates the importance of hashing out opposing opinions to hopefully allow people to understand each other's frustrations and to progress our given situation.
Some may argue that discussing opposing views will not enhance progress as individuals can be rigid in their stances, but I believe that this doesn’t withstand. Hearing other’s opinions is vital in understanding where they are coming from. If change is to occur in any situation, we need conversations from opposing views to occur, so that disagreements can be approached in a neutral way for progress to be made and not to be stuck in limbo.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'Me'?
Suggestion: the; Me
...y, sparking following movements such as the Me Too movement. These discussions have al...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ogress our given situation. Some may argue that discussing opposing views will not...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a neutral way" with adverb for "neutral"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...so that disagreements can be approached in a neutral way for progress to be made and not to be s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, well, as to, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2610.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81647050913 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 800.1 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0464649998 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.368421053 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4736842105 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160690066687 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507688062161 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477274314753 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100937823707 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574783710847 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.