In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement mentions that in any situation, hearing opposite thoughts will make progress. I agree with the prompt because hearing other's opinions will always make us to think about all outcome possibilities which can be beneficial.
First of all, when people hear about contrasting points, it is definitely going to open their minds to the situation. Thus, they can choose the best options or solutions to continue their goals or to improve the situation. Imagine a student who is under pressure and is studying for GRE exam. He or she just thinks about getting high grades from analytical writing part without paying attention to his/her writing methods. After while she gets frustrated with writing and still not getting good scores in practice exams because she does not pay attention to the time restriction in exam. But when she talks to one of her English professors, she figures it out that it is better to try to write an even non perfect essay in thirty minutes. Then she will be eventually able to write better essays by more practicing.
In addition, when people listen to the opposite views, they can be more experienced and knowledgeable person. Also, they can even improve their personalities. For example, an older boyfriend can advise her girlfriend that buying a very expensive dress is not necessary. Instead, she can buy two dresses by same amount of money or even save her rest of the money. Thus, a girlfriend can make a better decision in that situation.
On the contrary, some people may believe that having discussions about contrasting view is wasting their times which can be true in some cases. For example, it is understandable when a woman does not want to keep the baby whom was created by rape, no contrasting views is going to stop her decision. Obviously, in this situation hearing an opposite view will not make any progress.
Surely people will benefit from hearing opposite views because it can open their minds to become a better decision maker for improvement in any situation.
- The general welfare of a nation s people is a better indication of that nation s greatness than are the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In deve 58
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, first of all, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65791413126 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4413977147 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134143350918 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445941400239 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412996198315 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874702708502 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555727327052 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.