The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Humans are socializing creature and we learn from our mundane life or commonplace things. We might not notice minute changes or things around us and in our diurnal life, but we came across a myriad thing that we use regularly and has a huge effect on us. I, personally agree with the statement that best ideas arise from passionate commonplace things.
From our primordial life, we learned from our natural mother or we discern our environment and discovered useful materials use in our daily life. We observe and passionate about something we try to understand it and this passionate interests transform into study or ideas that could revolutionize our quotidian life. For example, Gallelio or newton observe mundane incidents and try to understand it that force them towards discovery. The Gallelio watched sun rises and set on a similar manner and that arises question and that passionate interests lead him to the conclusion that earth is round and mover around the sun, which was a rogue idea at that time.
Our modern-day lifestyle and daily concerns create ideas and lead towards discoveries. For example, our regular use of transportation or home amenities like washing machine or soap that make a difference in our daily life was discovered because of our quotidian concerns. Another example is Facebook, Facebook was first created to communicate within university students, later it was a become a revolutionized social media platform.
many people might argue that only passionate interests in commonplace things are not enough to create the best idea, but I would counter that passionate interest might not enough for discoveries but a step towards the change or creation.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say those commonplace surrounding posses the idea of discoveries and many regular necessities could arise interest in someone passionate about the idea. After all, discovery is the mother of necessities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | Zahid6400 | 54 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | gayatri5323 | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Murad1234 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 63
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing TaskThe United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can the from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, throug 80
- TPO-07 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- "For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters 51
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
... revolutionized social media platform. many people might argue that only passionate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, after all, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84725088583 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535256410256 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.122368474 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35061329567 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141150781865 0.0831039109588 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170586446847 0.0758088955206 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21026947199 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10217825586 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.