The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
It is one of the most discussed topic, what makes the head of a group a "leader" versus a "boss". After all, the term "leader" bares more auspicious qualities over "boss" for the leader refers to someone who coalesce the group's best interest and is open to voices from her group, while the boss refers to someone who dictates and make decisions solely upon her own discretion. It is irrefutable that the best leaders are the ones who actively encourages feedback from the people they lead and are open to such feedback.
The leader is an individual who takes the responsibility in executing critical decisions to promote the group's best interest. That being said, the only way for the leader to acknowledge and act upon the group's best interest is to hear the voices from within. For example, the empirical analyses on how and why the most successful companies are where they are today, heavily relies on their staff satisfaction and work environment. These companies maintain transcendent level of receiving feedback from their staffs and adjusting the needs. To be more detailed, compared to less notable companies with low staff satisfaction, these successful organizations offer better staff benefits (e.g., greater health insurance coverage) and flexible work environment to promote staff's best work efficiency (e.g., various types of workspaces to accommodate different types of working styles). The leaders (headquarters) of these companies accomplished more by actively receiving the staff feedback.
Furthermore, it is a fundamental process to thoroughly collect all the available data before any analysis or decision-making. The same logic applies to leading a group. As a leader, one must coalesce various and numerous feedback and comments from the group she is leading, in order to assess an on-going issues and to ultimately make an executive decision.
However, it is also true that the leader should have own discretion that will not fluctuate to merely please others. Regardless of the size and characteristics of a group, every individual carries different perspectives, different preferences, and different goals. When leading a group of individuals, it is simply impossible to make a decision that will please every single member of the group. Google, for example, despite being the most successful and most admired organization by both consumers and employees, is well-known for having a compact core "brain" consists of small number of people who make all the executive decisions for the company. Instead of hearing millions of different ideas and suggestions from every branch and team in the company, the several brains in the headquarter literally functions as the brain and command all the rest of Google members to just follow along. This case appropriately illustrates how on some regards, the best leader are those who are capable of having own discretion, instead of those who base off of group member's feedback.
Nevertheless, it is
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | sn140 | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | zzk81 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Aishwarya Jadhav | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | ryuha | 66 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 83
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 70
- The following is from a memo from the advertising director of the Super screen Movie Production Company. According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other 34
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 74
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d topic, what makes the head of a group a 'leader' versus a 'boss&...
^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... of a group a 'leader' versus a 'boss'. After all, the term &...
^
Line 2, column 889, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'headquarter'.
Suggestion: headquarter
...nt types of working styles. The leaders headquarters of these companies accomplished more by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...p she is leading, in order to assess an on-going issues and to ultimately make an execut...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 789, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...m in the company, the several brains in the headquarter literally functions as the brain and co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1067, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
... instead of those who base off of group members feedback. Nevertheless, it is
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, after all, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2540.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3813559322 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16205054215 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514830508475 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3896440105 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.684210526 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8421052632 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303865465288 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997326747124 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132603033631 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173884625702 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611214626715 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.