The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Feedback is definitely an important input to someone's process of self improvement. The effectiveness and usefulness of the feedback, however, is subject to numerous factors. All the great leaders history presents to us tended to not only encourage feedback from their subjects but also scrutinize the feedback and act on it accordingly and cautiously.
To begin with, consider a situation where a manager in an IT company sent out feedback forms to his resources. There are people who do not take these feedbacks with the seriousness they deserve and just fill out the forms randomly. Such feedback is obviously of no use and works to waste time of the manager instead.
Meanwhile, some sycophantic employees in the same IT company under the same manager might give overtly positive feedback in order to get preference or other professional advantage. Such feedback could cause more harm than good to the motives of improvement of the manager as it may make him complacent.
The polar opposite of this is also a possibility. If someone is jealous, has a grudge or any other negative feeling about the manager, chances are, regardless of the quality of manager's work, their feedback is going to be negative. This doesnt help serve as quality feedback either.
As we can see from the few of a lot of example scenarios discussed above, feedback can not always be trusted. Therefore, a good leader must be, and usually is, analytical about the feedback he receives. Only after diligent thought about the candor and genuineness of the person giving the feedback he/she must commensurately act on how he/she can make use of it to be an even better leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | sn140 | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | zzk81 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Aishwarya Jadhav | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | ryuha | 66 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through 79
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 63
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ject to numerous factors. All the great leaders history presents to us tended to not on...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...consider a situation where a manager in an IT company sent out feedback forms to his ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...er a situation where a manager in an IT company sent out feedback forms to his resource...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...me sycophantic employees in the same IT company under the same manager might give overt...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... feedback is going to be negative. This doesnt help serve as quality feedback either. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 277.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81888667136 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610108303249 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8891743936 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9285714286 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216666769691 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716384843616 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544618890013 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109645836571 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535685048613 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.