A leader represents its team and is essentially the driving force to make or break the position of the team in the organization. The first part of the statement encourages the development of one of the prolific leadership qualities, cooperation. Whereas, the second part denounces the importance of the sense of competition, which in my view is an essential part of scaling up the position of an organization.
A team without a cooperative leader crumbles from within and the efficiency of the work done by them suffer gravely. The efficacy of different governance institutions can be seen as an example. The more authoritarian is the leader of the institution, the lesser motivation is provided for the team members. In current times it is evident that the mass, in general, holds a democratic government as the most effective government as it provides a platform to every sector to have its own voice and a position to weave in their own policies to increase their own outputs, which ultimately decides the overall growth of the nation, economically or otherwise. I do agree with the author, but only partially.
The second part of the statement treats the sense of cooperation and competition as opposite tastes. An institution's progress is determined not just by its own productivity but is also measured with respect to the growth of different other similar institutions. In my view, a leader should cooperate with its team building each member's personal strengths, instilling in them a sense of competition as a motivation to use their strengths in a rewarding direction. Unless the leader itself is not competitive enough, it won't be able to impart that sense into its team, thus hampering the productivity of the institution.
In conclusion, the author is correct in expressing the importance of imparting a sense of cooperation into the young future leaders but is wrong to ask it at the expense of the sense of competition. Both of these qualities come together to build a leader who can drive its institution to great heights.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 50
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, thus, whereas, in conclusion, in general, in my view, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0383480826 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13557804965 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516224188791 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9465174696 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133915672291 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044252944435 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235617616099 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801764557412 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00817513444112 0.0667264976115 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.