The best way for a society to prepare as young people call leadership in government industry or other field is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition.
Here the author says that to prepare young people for different roles of leadership in different fields of life, they should thought about cooperation instead of competition with their allies. I totally agree with the author on this topic. If there is cooperation among the leader and his team member than it would be very benefical for the organization as whole.
A leader should be a good listener. He should listen to all the ideas and suggestion presented in front of him irrespective of the person who persents it. He should listen with all his attention, before he accepts or rejects the suggestion. This would be helpful as the leader could get a break through idea from his teammates. Let us understand this with the help of an example. Suppose there are two teams in an organization, let's say team A and team B with a different leader for both team. The leader of team A is very cooperartive with his team mates. He is very open to suggestion and he follows horizontal chain of command, in which all the team member comes together to make an important decisssion. Whereas, the leader of team B is not so welcoming to the ideas presented by the team members and he straight away rejects it. He follows vertical line of command in which he just commands work to the team member which they have to complete. This will increase the sense of competition among the team B as each team member would only think about them self and eventually it would affect the result of the team. In the case of team A the result would be much better as there would be cooperation between the team member and they would work in a union towards a common goal.
If there is cooperation among different teams, than it is very benefical for the companies.Let's say that a company needs to launch a new product in the market. So before launching the product or even before designing a product, different members of different field should have a meeting of how the product is going to be manufactured. Different teams like design, research and development, sales, marketing, all should come together for the discussion. This would help to reduce the time and money spent on launching a new product. As there would be cooperation among the different teams from the start and they woud eliminate the problems which were going to be face by different teams in the future before the production starts. Suppose there was no cooperation among different teams than, it could have happen that the sales people took order without seeing that the developing team could make that in time or not. This non-cooperation would affect the organization in terms of money, time and raw material loss.
I am not saying that there should not be competition of any kind among the team. A small competition is necessary as it keeps the workers motivated to do their best work. Having an ill type of competion would be disadvantagous for industries and in any type of cooperates.
If there is a cooperation between different industries, countries than it would benefit both of them. Let's say that Country X is good at suppling tea and Country Y is good at suppling rice. Than both the countries can make a pact of cooperation and they can sell thier products to each other at a lower cost. This helps in making the relationship between two countries stronger. So, for a society to progress, young people should be taught of cooperation with their peers instead of showing them as they are competitor of one another.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | habbibat | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assured until a musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1138, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: A; The
...result of the team. In the case of team A the result would be much better as there wo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...e is cooperation among different teams, than it is very benefical for the companies....
^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lets
... it is very benefical for the companies.Lets say that a company needs to launch a ne...
^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... it is very benefical for the companies.Lets say that a company needs to launch a ne...
^^^^
Line 3, column 807, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...ong different teams than, it could have happen that the sales people took order withou...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ies than it would benefit both of them. Lets say that Country X is good at suppling ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...and Country Y is good at suppling rice. Than both the countries can make a pact of c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2869.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71100164204 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69743906957 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.413793103448 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 864.0 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.933737985 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 5.21951772744 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129894036487 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387254157932 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545950626615 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103867247969 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589711144949 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.