The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other field is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Leadership, by definition, is the act of ruling people. Some would argue that a society should focus on instilling cooperation into its young people for leadership preparation. But others would state that instilling competition among young people by the society is the best way to prepare them for leadership. After weighing the evidence, it is certain that instilling cooperation among young people is the best way to prepare them for leadership.
Those who would argue that competition among young people is crucial in preparing them for leadership may point to the fact that competition brings out the best among them. Suppose a tedious task is put forward for some group of young people to accomplish within certain period, some will be able to complete the task while some will not. Those who were able to accomplish the task within the stipulated time may see themselves as being the best or taking the lead among the rest. However, this approach is not the best as the rest of the young people, who were unable to complete the task may see themselves as incapable, hence, feel slighted in long run.
Meanwhile, instilling cooperation among young people help them to have sense of working in group which is the key to maintain leadership position irrespective of the sector. In the University, for instance, the Head of Department serves as the leader to other lecturers in the same department; Such person has to share role for other lecturers for proper functioning of the department. This is done through mutual cooperation between the leader (HOD) and the lead.
In bringing up the idea of cooperation among young people, pride might set in due to differences in mode of learning in group. However, the young people who may seem themselves as coming out well in the group can be advised further inorder to shaping their prevailing negative traits.
In conclusion, it's clear that a society should focus on instilling cooperation into its young people for leadership preparation. If anything, preparing the young one for leadership through competition only serves as contrast so we can understand what leadership really is.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | habbibat | 50 | view |
- Students are more responsible for their educations than are their teachers 50
- Technology causes more problems for modern societies than it solves 58
- The following was written as part of a study weighing the benefits of a new construction project in the city of Winterville Car racing is extremely popular in the city of Winterville over 20 000 Winterville residents attended the state s annual 500 lap ra 70
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 55
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other field is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, really, so, still, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07932011331 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76554002067 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467422096317 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7967664696 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.533333333 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516651020887 0.243740707755 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203249566326 0.0831039109588 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171711920913 0.0758088955206 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310858186265 0.150359130593 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183000859105 0.0667264976115 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.