Teaching someone the right things to do in life is a delicate job to do. The proper and most benificial way of doing this can be debated and still the debate may end on a cliffhanger. In the prompt, it is mentioned that praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones is the best way to teach. Though praising the positive actions can play a vital role in someone's life, I mostly disagree with the statement for a number of reasons.
First of all, if we simply ignore the negative actions taken by someone, the one making those actions may not be able to understand that something is wrong with the actions. In order to reduce the person's negative actions, much emphasis must be put in those. Counselling the person properly is needed to make him understand what is going wrong. Otherwise, he can spend his whole life repeating the same actions without even knowing something was wrong those, or even worse, being attacked by someone for a particular action in a horrific way, when he had no idea something was wrong with it. For example, if a child starts disrespecting the elderly people in the family, he needs to be made aware of the fact that this is not the right way to behave. If his parents just ignore this action, he may end up disrespecting every elderly person he meets in his life, which may lead to severe consequences. So, telling what is wrong in a straightforward way is a must but it has to be done in a way without hurting the person.
Secondly, if a person doesn't get to know what he is doing wrong, he would not be able to correct it. To improve the characteristics and be a better person we need to know how we can improve things we are doing in a wrong way. Before knowing how to improve, we need to know what to improve. This is a continuous process that lasts a lifetime, as none can be completely pure. It is in the way of improving little things, that we make ourselves a better person. So, in order to, teach someone to achieve a better way of life, first he has to taught what are the inappropriate actions taken by him and then the exhaustive way of correcting it. That is putting a lot of emphasis on the wrong actions and not just ignoring those. For instance, if we want to teach the child the mentioned aproper way to behave, first, we need to tell he is disrespecting the elderly people and then we need to teach how he can behave properly.
We cannot deny the significance of praising the positive actions to encourage a person to accomplish more, to be a better person, and keep up the good work but praising postive actions and warning negative ones must be done simultaneouly to achieve the best results in teaching a person.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be p 58
- The best way to teach is to praise the positive actions and ignore the negative ones 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five best selling cheeses at our newest store were domestic cheddar cheeses from Wisconsin Furthermore a recent surve 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a horrific way" with adverb for "horrific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cked by someone for a particular action in a horrific way, when he had no idea something was wron...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 928, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a straightforward way" with adverb for "straightforward"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...consequences. So, telling what is wrong in a straightforward way is a must but it has to be done in a wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng the person. Secondly, if a person doesnt get to know what he is doing wrong, he ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... how we can improve things we are doing in a wrong way. Before knowing how to improve, we need...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, as to, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4693877551 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61667035851 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426530612245 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3715684216 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323787668652 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120816096731 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180656156901 0.0758088955206 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253969360966 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114214241629 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.