The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I mostly agree with the prompt's assertion that praising the positive results of students by the tutor is the best approach to teaching rather than focusing on the negative ones for the following two reasons. However, I do concede that areas where students are struggling cannot be ignored, and this must approach in a diplomatic way.
First of all, the desire of every tutor is that the student is motivated to learn and to do more. Apparently, motivation can only come when one is being praised continually for the great works done. Take for instance, Lionel messi, the best footballer in the world. At the inception of Messi's career, he wasn't the best or good, he was fortunate to have a good coach who always praise him everytime he plays, even during training. This encouraged him, he believed what his coach always calls him and he was so motivated to do more and he became the best in the history of football.
Secondly, the best way to communicate values is in a comity environment. When a tutor induges in praising the good achivements of the students, there will be a good rapor between them and it will be so easy to communicate values to them. My project work experience will be a perfect example. My project coordinator always told me I'm brilliant, the way I think is very keen. This brought a very good relationship between us. I could ask literally any question from him. I had a very great result and we could something substantial.
However, humans are bound to make mistakes, struggle while learning, it is part of the process. Tutors cannot ignore that aspect, but it has to be communicated in a very diplomatic way. Scientists have shown us that working on our mistakes make us better. This is very imperative.
In conclusion, humans are emotional being, they tend to do more when appreciated. Infact, they fight destructive critcism with all their strength, even though they are ready to listen and learn from a constructive one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times 60
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 40
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 67
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
I mostly agree with the prompts assertion that praising the positive re...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a diplomatic way" with adverb for "diplomatic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nnot be ignored, and this must approach in a diplomatic way. First of all, the desire of every tut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
.... At the inception of Messis career, he wasnt the best or good, he was fortunate to h...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
.... My project coordinator always told me Im brilliant, the way I think is very keen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, while, as for, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76401179941 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71842633105 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572271386431 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1964284334 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.95 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109298335109 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031836094164 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489311192332 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621326514494 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508389346938 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.