Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Universities encouraging students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying might seem a good idea considering the fact that most successful people in life have testified to their interest in a particular subject, school, environmental or activity as one of the reasons they are high fliers in the respective fields or vocation. I am of a contrary opinion to the idea, in the sense that we leave in a complex and changing world it would not be advisable to parochial if one wants to fit in todays society.
Take a look a science for example, most student find mathematics interesting and other aspect of science especially chemistry and physics highly theoreticall but this field are in one way or the other inter connected, many scientists with nobel prices in innovative discoveries in chemistry where either mathematicians or physicist, schroginger who determine the uncertainty principle widely applied in chemistry in determining the decay of radioactive substances was a physicist. If he had no idea of chemistry there could have been no way he could have applied this particulate- wave property of atoms in explaining the activity of radia active element.
Also in our comtemporary world we see how inter-related many displicine are, technology in been used to improve the efficiency of surgury, and in chemistry the accuracy of analysis. An engineer who will design medical equipment might not be a crack in medicine but who be required of such person to have a layman knowledge of medicine. Where i currently work as a quality control scientist, my little engineering knowledge which i obtain during my sophomore year has aided me in easily detecting origin of flaws in product and this helped in effectly dealing with the problem by giving appropriate feed back to the right operator.
Many people might be of the opinion that only what one has interest in will be understood, at pre college level that might be true but at university level matured and well groomed mind are what make up the caliber of student and it is expected of the to be able to over any challenge thrown at them. It is therefore advisable to encourage student to take all course that will be beneficial to them and not only those they have interest in.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have better lives than their parents had when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Recent incursions by deep sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population With the breeding season fast approaching the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase Nonetheless the po 70
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 66
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...radioactive substances was a physicist. If he had no idea of chemistry there could...
^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
..., my little engineering knowledge which i obtain during my sophomore year has aid...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92689295039 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91255575065 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57180156658 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 23.0359550562 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.963919728 60.3974514979 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 209.666666667 118.986275619 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.5555555556 23.4991977007 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16258961711 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681162127124 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886640223558 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985537472184 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676658071308 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 14.1392134831 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.85 48.8420337079 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 12.1743820225 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 11.2143820225 168% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.