The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and
explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific
circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how
these examples shape your position.
The aim of teaching is to mold a student capable of using his learnings to the advantage of himself and society. The result of successful teaching can range from a student being the first in his family to get a job, to inspiring Albert Einstein to pursue physics and publish groundbreaking papers. Optimal teaching for the student is the goal. This not only depends on improving capability but also, cultivating a positive mindset. A teacher such as Mr. Keating from Dead Poet's Society could change the lives of his students just by praising their talents and broadening their view of skills such as poetry. This makes learning a lifelong adventure that a student can look forward to.
The given topic makes the assumption that following the practice of praising positive actions but ignoring faults is the best teaching that leads to optimal learning. It can be said that ignoring faults paints a much more attractive picture of subjects, creates an environment where all that is right lives. However, ignoring faults mitigates the importance of failure.
Failure is the commonality between every learner in history. It is the steppingstones to true learning. Ignoring it and making a student oblivious to failure's power stunts them. Let us tales the well-known saying: "Give a man a fish he eats for a day, teach a man to fish he eats for a lifetime". If we taught this main by praising his conviction to fish it would certainly make him happy. But if we ignored his faulty stance and incorrect aum, he would ultimatley starve. His starvation would result in him blaming himself for not being able to catch the fish. The lesson from this example is that positive reinforcement is definitely using for encouraging learning, but in the real world, mistakes are the more useful lessons. Realizing this harsh truth without preparation destroys any benefit created by positive reinforcement in the long run.
Hence, optimal teaching relies not only on praising positive actions to encourage learning, but also on correcting negative ones, so no student is limited by their natural capabilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- Claim It is no longer possible for a siciety to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anupne who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response on the extent to which you agree or disagree with th 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n to fish he eats for a lifetime'. If we taught this main by praising his con...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08357348703 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81523600035 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561959654179 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6119122126 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8421052632 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131009664523 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410023333793 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405955538383 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910002163599 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262549560582 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.