In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling
reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Some people believe that the new leader of a certain society or organization, such as in business, education or government, cannot be trusted until they show their ability, and build trust. I agree with the statement that people need some time to trust the new leader. Critics may assert that skepticism towards the leader may attenuate his or her ability and trust between members. Despite the concerns made by critics are reasonable in certain cases, the statement argument sounds more convincing. The following essay will discuss why and why not the argument sounds plausible.
First of all, the critics may challenge against the idea that members of a society should wait and remain skeptic till the leader is good enough to believe. If people kept their attitude skeptical towards the new leader, it would be hard to assess one's ability accurately. Therefore a lot more time will be taken until they trust their new leader. If workers do not believe their leaders, in the case of a business situation, the business productivity results will be attenuated. Also, the chance to show the new leaders are a qualified person is quite rare. Without emergency situations nor significant efficiency increased, there are not enough criteria to decide whether he or she is a right one. Accordingly, based on the above reasons and examples, the author's claim can disagree to a certain degree.
Secondly, however, no matter time take to decide he or she is the proper leader, I believe people should be kept remain skeptistic to show one's talent as a leader. Because the role of the leader is not just working hard, but to handle emergency situations such as economic crisis or scandals. This kind of competences is hardly measurable. Therefore people need to keep their eye on the person who is in charge of a group.
Moreover, usually, inexperienced or in unfamiliar situations, a person tends to make more mistakes or strange decisions, even though they have a strong competence as a leader. Thus, people should not accept new leaders' decision uncritically for a specific time. Therefore, the author's claim does not stand right all the time.
In conclusion, while the author's claim might seem beneficial in certain conditions, in light of the above counterpoints
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... new leader, it would be hard to assess ones ability accurately. Therefore a lot mor...
^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hard to assess ones ability accurately. Therefore a lot more time will be taken until the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 140, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...hould be kept remain skeptistic to show ones talent as a leader. Because the role of...
^^^^
Line 6, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nd of competences is hardly measurable. Therefore people need to keep their eye on the pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06133333333 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72613686784 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2032393914 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223851941037 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679616176695 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684209823064 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113019416857 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740525644791 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.