Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte

Essay topics:

Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action. Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing the action. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.

Employees who are a part of the company will definitely know the company in and out, but will not be as efficient as an outside consulting firm/individual. Hiring consultants might seem like just another extraneous spend for the company, but in the long run, the experience will add significant value to the company.

There is no question that an employee will know the company better than an outsider, but as a part of the company, a certain bias is to be expected when it comes to taking harsh decisions which will ultimately benefit the company. Dispassion is very important when it comes to taking unrelenting decisions like letting go of people when there’s a need for cutback in costs, or not undermining situations which require immediate action on part of the company. As an example: If a certain manager at a company has to choose sides in a work related conflict, where 2 of his subordinates are suggesting different ways of going about a decision regarding a company, he might end up being partial, and choose someone he knows has been right in the past, even if the other person is providing the more efficient solution. He might not have intended to do it purposely, but the preconceived notion that the one who has been at the company longer, might make better decisions is wrong.

Trained and experienced consultants will bring in a distinct and fresh perspective that the existing employees may not be able to provide. Those people who are a part of the system might be used to a certain way of doing things, and a certain level of complacency might have kicked in. Change is not always welcome, and this is precisely why the company needs some outside help to add that extra amount of organization and coherence.

Furthermore, these consulting firms/ individuals specialise in the field. Having worked with a lot of companies these consultants will have a better sense of judgement in spotting common gaps in the company’s functioning that they might have resolved in the prior companies they worked for. So they clearly have the advantage of experience in this case. They will be much more efficient in understanding and assessing the company’s requirements and the underlying issues that might not be noticeable to someone working in the company. They will do a better job at considering

Although time and costs involved might be an added concern if the company is not doing that well financially, doing things systematically will be of utmost importance. In spite of the disadvantages, the extra help will be very useful, and the experience these firms bring in with them will be very beneficial. Therefore, weighing in all the advantages and disadvantages, hiring a specialised firm for consulting will be a profitable move for the company leading to a more efficient and organized work environment.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-04 Aishwarya01 54 view
2023-07-13 Technoblade 66 view
2022-09-12 Sumilak 66 view
2022-08-21 headboy 50 view
2022-06-07 Jaichiddharth R K 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user sonalb9 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... of a certain action, the final outcome shouldnt be the only factor taken into considera...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66066838046 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6586495576 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511568123393 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.8470434367 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.65 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292421202043 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853827692198 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962407479404 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182244726424 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605202164749 0.0667264976115 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.