Success obviously demands hard work but with little incisiveness. Any endeavor require some intelligence through which this hard work can be converted into auspicious future. People who want to do diligent work in the respective field may require to look into past for any promising fields. By looking into past one can determine significant details. Although first seem promising, this approach may not provide succinct and sufficient information to go ahead. By contrary, another approach is likely to be agreeable which says that there is no need of influencing by past just do assiduously present work and any endeavor will make the great contribution in the respective field.
"Need is the mother of invention"-Present need always attract people to do some creative. Needs may be brand new and not be modeled by reminiscent data in the respective field. In such a situation there are no such past achievements but still, it is possible to satisfy that want. the aerospace technology and knowledge almost a new technology which might have an age around fifty years. Before the first journey of human to the moon, there were not any previous achievement in this field and, even this technology would never come to the mind of our ancestors; but after that NASA could land its first spacecraft on the moon, the new science of aerospace was established.
As mentioned earlier, There is no need to be greatly influenced by past achievements. Spurious achievements can impair the investment of wealth and time. Sporadic achievements are those which are not enduring but by contrary it is ephemeral.and this should not be considered while making current contributions. Reminiscent data does not reflect current need and demand; they only provide some basis for investing in a particular field. It does not affirm the success in the context of current need. The 19th century is an era of the computer but in the 23rd century based on the past data one should not take a risk for working or investing in this field. Past data does not always reflect current need and one can not jump directly without analyzing present needs.
People's need always evolving over time means it is vacillating. In past, some conspicuous promising fields are not auspicious in the current scenario. This is because of people's ever-changing mind. One should aware of investing wealth and time because after this would happen there is no chance to return. Based on some past achievements one cannot decide in which field one should invest their efforts. Nokia is the prevalent example for such position. Past data had indicated that Nokia's clients are loyal and it is safe to invest in their own technology rather than in Android, They had not collaborated with Android and as a consequence, they have to pay a huge price for that.
One should not totally dependent upon the past data to work in any field. Contribution can be made without influenced by past achievements. and one should unshakably agreeable that past achievements are just a mere basis for how respective field is and what can be the ramifications after jumping into that field. It is possible to contribute in any field without past.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- “The best way to teach-whether as an educator, employer or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 66
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students. 50
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'requires'.
Suggestion: requires
... with little incisiveness. Any endeavor require some intelligence through which this ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'looking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: looking
...ork in the respective field may require to look into past for any promising fields. By ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...l, it is possible to satisfy that want. the aerospace technology and knowledge almo...
^^^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...ving over time means it is vacillating. In past, some conspicuous promising fields are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ithout influenced by past achievements. and one should unshakably agreeable that pa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2672.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04150943396 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88979742478 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450943396226 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 823.5 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.19908979 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1379310345 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.275862069 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.48275862069 5.21951772744 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261879983149 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800883343016 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727495288718 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169623606525 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657251000061 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.