Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Leadership in business, politics, education, government, greatly determine the efficiency and potential success in society. A good leader can enable the workers, citizens, students to devote themselves to society; while a bad leader may result in people’s resisting on every policy by this leader, contributing to other aspects of protests. However, whether leaders should step down after five years, from my perspective, depend on whether they have the ability to be satisfying leaders instead of the time length in power.
It is true that long time in power might trigger corruption. For instance, the leader in government utilizes his power to govern the citizens with disparity, but other workers are not brave enough to question his measurements for fear of losing their jobs. Then this kind of leader should step down absolutely after five years. Also, as time goes by, the leader’s mind may not quickly catch up with the development of the society. Take education for example. As the means of teaching and learning become increasingly various, if the policy-makers continue grading the teachers and students with the same level ten years before, then those leaders in the education administration should be changed with new-generation managers.
However, whether revitalization through new leadership can surely generate success remains doubtful in some fields. For a competitive business company, the policy of the leader has the decisive influence of the company. Five years is not long for a growing company. And the teamwork exert positive effects on the efficiency which may contribute greatly to the profits of the company. If the leader is changed frequently, it is a waste of time for workers to accustom themselves to the new leader, which may seriously result in the failure of the whole company. In such a company whose founders are of great importance, frequently changing the manager can lead to the whole failure of the company.
What’s more, it is doubtful whether revitalization is the surest path to success. The critical way to success is not the leader, but the whole workers in the company. The leader is only a part of a company, the profits and policies are collectively made by all instead of the leader solely. Only changing the leadership doesn’t necessarily guarantee a better chance of succeeding. For business, high efficiency is the main factor of earning more money. For education, the teaching method of teachers are of great importance. After all it is teachers other than the ministration who interact the students directly. And it is teachers who impart knowledge that determine the future of a country.
We cannot hastily put forward a conclusion that because revitalization is the surest path to success, we should apply this to every field in power. Given the fact that every field has its distinctions and characteristics, the claim is not in favor of every field. For every field, whether the leadership should be changed every five years is dependent on the need and the potential impacts.
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 73
- "Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies — Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the 89
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 66
- All parents should be required to volunteer their time to their children's schools. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 471, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...end on whether they have the ability to be satisfying leaders instead of the time length in p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to become'
Suggestion: to become
.... As the means of teaching and learning become increasingly various, if the policy-mak...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, while, after all, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2578.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22920892495 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9411722739 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 802.8 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.2842752957 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1538461538 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9615384615 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256419171947 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718955044144 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628159073658 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142311322709 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351207553688 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.