Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.
History provides us with both the success we have achieved and the failure we have encountered in the past years. And some maintain that history is the most important subject, omiting the significance of other subjects. Meanwhile, some contend subjects which are aimed to impart science and knowledge should be attached more importance than history. From my perspective, however, history and science are equally crucial in school.
For one thing, history brings encouragement and inspiration to students because it usually contains numerous events about bravery and decisive persons who showed no fear when confronted with enemies. For instance, in Chinese history, Dong Cunrui lig up the bomb in his hand in order to killing the enemies around him. For another, history offers the development of scientific research. In ancient times, people made fire by friction of the wood. Then with matches invented, fire was more easily to make. Only when we know the process of an invention can we plan what to do next.
In addition, science and technology subjects offer students scientific approaches to research. Undoubtedly, science is indispensable in society which brings more convenience to our life and enriches our knowledge about the world. Inventions require logical ways, creative ideas, and a wide range of knowledge, all of which can be obtained in subjects like physics, chemistry. Smartphones incredibly change our lifestyles, shortening the distance between people and enabling us to shop online. We can attribute science subjects to this great change.
All in all, History and Science both play a critical role in school. It is unwise to claim science is more important than history since they have irreplaceable benefits for students.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 70
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. 56
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to plan and organize. 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding enemies'?
Suggestion: the surrounding enemies
...he bomb in his hand in order to killing the enemies around him. For another, history offers the develo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rder to killing the enemies around him. For another, history offers the development...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38545454545 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78386377552 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625454545455 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1596201574 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1176470588 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317205466626 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910659363071 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083175205393 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182053818622 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845157581515 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.