The speaker asserts that imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. In my view the speaker unfairly generalizes. As we exam different fields of inquiry, we shall see that in some area, especially in arts, imagination often have a more significant role than other characters such as experience. However, in some other fields, particularly in physics and math, scientific progress relies on the experience of those brilliant scientists. In still other fields, such as business and engineering, both imagination and experience are required for excellent achievements. Therefore, I believe that the view of the speaker is inaccurate.
An artist would need his or her talent of imagination to create distinguished artwork. In the process of generating artistic works, artists could not come to a great breakthrough without imagination beyond the worldly life. It is possible that abundant experience could be fundamental to drawing a picture or sculpturing. But if an artist could not imagine about art itself, even though he or she has abundant experience, this so-called artist is nothing more than a copier, would not have enough ability to create his or her own miracle. Only when a skilled artist has sufficient imagination, great works of art could be finished. Therefore, I believe in the art world, imagination is more valuable than experience.
However, on the contrary, in the natural science world of physics and math, experience would hold a more important status than imagination. Every scientific deduction must be fully based on careful observation and precise statistic data. A scientist with abundant experiences in research, even though he or she is not very creative, could apply elaborate experiments, collect detailed experiment data, infer possible theories responsively and come to a reasonable conclusion eventually. But a scientist who imagines a lot but has little experience, maybe carry on research with errors and irresponsible conclusions.
In the fields of business and engineering, imagination and experience are both significant. Without imagination, one could not make difference; without experience, one could not transform his or her imagination into reality. Only those people whose imagination and imagination are both abundant would have possibilities to success in these fields.
In sum, in some fields such as art, imagination is a more valuable asset than experience, while in some other fields, experience is more important, or they are equally significant. Therefore, people should take different attitudes toward these two traits when facing different situations.
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc."A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks ar 66
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 50
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton, 50 miles away. Moreover, relative to population size, the diagnosis of stress-related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton. 58
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton, 50 miles away. Moreover, relative to population size, the diagnosis of stress-related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton. 58
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, such as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5725 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17320717099 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7250139469 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255467728313 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852767780896 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726778604147 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153934319748 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208887377127 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.