Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The given claim and reason is highly controvertible, people might have different opinion regard the same. Personally, I’m consonant with the claim on which it is based and prolong the assertion with several reasons.
First of all, There has been rise on the information source in today’s contemporary world which is followed by the augmentation of medias. With this, the scrutiny about living hero is quite commonplace. These medias to stand out in competition at the age of information concerns on building up news that are trivial as well. In such a situation, Living heros are often subjected to media scrutiny even when in small flaw found related to their reputation. For instance, Justin biber is one of the eminent singer in the world who was subjected to scrutiny about being gay because of association made by media about his character few years ago. This issue had hampered in his reputation.
Secondly, It is difficult to build up a good reputation in current world while to loose the reputation is like an evanescent. For Instance, Kevin Spacey, an actor famous for his character played as Frank Underwood in House of Card, was not able to play his role in the last season because of court issue about sexual harsh. If it wasn’t for media scrutiny, He would have been able to take his role in final season.
Some people argue that, Despite the media scrutiny that degrade the reputation of the famous person, The great work done by these people will never be forgotten. This claim might hold true when the famous people is dead and the reputation creates a mark for peoples to remember but, for the living heroes it is indispensable in the presence of media and prevalent information age,.
In conclusion, The reputation of the living heros who are subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be dismissed in the current world because of influx of information and communication medium. The goods works done by these heroes are only be valuable after they are dead, else to maintain their reputation, they need to be careful from being subjected to media scrutiny.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Morienta | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Nico Lingga | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | shivamchug | 54 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples. 70
- School should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood. 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...od reputation in current world while to loose the reputation is like an evanescent. F...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...d while to loose the reputation is like an evanescent. For Instance, Kevin Spacey, an actor f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...e of media and prevalent information age,. In conclusion, The reputation of the...
^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'work'.
Suggestion: work
...ion and communication medium. The goods works done by these heroes are only be valuab...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95750708215 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7057161297 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535410764873 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2840294168 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248292308939 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826168679434 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562095042408 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136491595509 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512463168187 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.