Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions
today.
Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past
events until we have some distance from both.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The statement claims that knowing the past is less likely help the people to make important decisions because it is less likely to able to make connections between current events and past events until some distance from both. I agree with the statement insofar as everything is changable and there are little connection between the past and present. Additionally, due to technological advancement it is quite impossible to make the connection between past and present. However, as nature follow the particular pattern and sequence, so sometimes it is judgeable by considering the past. Also knowing the past help the people to learn from mistake and use the experience in present.
One compelling argument in favor on my position is nature is changable. In the world everything is changed day by day. So here knowing the past less likely help the people to make the decision because of curcumstances. For example, in 1990 dhaka city was as like as the today's rural area. So any person tried to stablish his business in 1990 never help this experience to build the same business in 2024 because of the environment and all circumstances are changed. So decision that should be taken today more likely to be wrong if he take consideration 1990.
Another argument is due to technological advancement there are little connection between past and present. Industrial revolution has occured and in everywhere we can see the automation. So it is more likely impossible to judge and take decision based on past and analog system.In the sector of information technology and industry, past is less likely help to take any decision. For instance, few decades ago, no one can imagine todays technology like smartphone, computer. At that time to do communication, many analogue system had to use. So this obsolate system can not help to take any decision in tadays advance technologies.
Moreover, as education is spreaded all over the world, so the morality and the rate of literacy is increased rapidly. So the contemporary culture and the society has changed. Knowing the past can help here to take any decision.
However, as the nature has followed a contineous pattern so in come case knowing the past can help to take any decision. Although the society is changed, technology is advanced and industries are automated, knowing the past can help how to avoid dangerous situations and act with peoples. Also every times experience has different value and it can not be earned without facing and knowing the past. For example, in society, when group of people fall in denger or have to atake any critical steps, they like to take advise from the old people because of their experience and they know the past. Knwoing the past is more likely to help to learn from mistake and use this experience in present.
In conclusion, knowing the past are less likely to help to take any decision in most areas where technology are related. But in some cases, knowing the past and experience can help to take any crucial decision. Every technology are come from learning and fix this mistake so knowing the past is necessary. But for taking any decision we should consider whether it can help to take a decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | Zahid6400 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Jeyodi123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | vrushali28 | 50 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | Saugat Basnet | 59 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show the categories of workforce in Australia and the unemployment within the three groups Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication do benefits of this outweigh the problems 61
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 587, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...t is judgeable by considering the past. Also knowing the past help the people to lea...
^^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
...ken today more likely to be wrong if he take consideration 1990. Another argument ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ecision based on past and analog system.In the sector of information technology an...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...gerous situations and act with peoples. Also every times experience has different va...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2655.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 539.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92578849722 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74837168223 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.413729128015 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 876.6 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2645266099 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5517241379 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5862068966 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20689655172 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304520383771 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922951034862 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994127017539 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177990368431 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121011013294 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.