Society relies on the government to address their adversities. After all, governments exist to serve their citizens, but can the government fix all its citizen's problems, especially modern societal quandries? The issue argues that the majority of modern problems cannot be solved by laws or legal systems for they cannot change people’s hearts and minds. I mostly agree with this issue and will elaborate further in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, I must acknowledge the effectiveness of the legal system. While it might be ineffective at solving every modern societal issue, it is particularly effective at solving several serious problems. For example, the legal system and laws have shut down numerous organized drug businesses, and laws against corruption have increased the effectiveness of government organizations. Thus, regulations are essential as they possess the power of changing minds, albeit not on all matters.
On the contrary, many of the modern societal problems are almost untouchable by the judicial system. For instance, the emergence of social media and the internet has bred an epidemic of mental health problems in the youth. These problems are the results of people's own choices, and the government cannot solve these problems by establishing laws restricting people's access to the internet because it violates the human right to freedom. This shows that the nature of modern societal problems renders the judicial system ineffective.
Lastly, laws primarily rely on fear of punishment to work; they act as a deterrent. But fear is not the only effective solution to contemporary problems, and they might even be detrimental in some cases. Alternative solutions such as awareness and rewarding upstanding behavior have shown to be efficacious. For example, mass awareness about discrimination against the LGBTQ community has exceedingly influenced general perspective towards them, resulting in people being more accepting of such individuals. Hence, it is possible to solve social issues without the involvement of laws.
In conclusion, this is a very complex topic. For particular problems, such as corruption, the legal system is effective and might be the only solution. However, the convoluted nature of modern issues renders laws obsolete and begs to be approached from various perspectives. Alternatives such as awareness and rewarding policies, which are effective at changing people's minds, are better equipped to solve contemporary issues.
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 60
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 83
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 67
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 69
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stricting peoples access to the internet because it violates the human right to f...
^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the nature of modern societal problems renders the judicial system ineffective....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, lastly, so, thus, while, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59151193634 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99884472358 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546419098143 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1503199684 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.380952381 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256309816166 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724004062987 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735182122249 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146350129368 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496747592265 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stricting peoples access to the internet because it violates the human right to f...
^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the nature of modern societal problems renders the judicial system ineffective....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, lastly, so, thus, while, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59151193634 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99884472358 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546419098143 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1503199684 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.380952381 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256309816166 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724004062987 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735182122249 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146350129368 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496747592265 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.