Research is a base factor for any innovative technology. To discover something new and contribute to the society; it will take many more efforts and practice. It is not related to a particular field definitely. Researchers have to go through many kinds of stuff and contents to achieve the desired result. Also, it is not certain if they will get success in the first attempt. It will take many more attempts to reach desired output which might be far different from the designed and desired one. I agree with the author's statement.
If we take an example of Internet of Things field. It is a wide range of applications in different fields. The root of those applications definitely should not be restricted up to only IoT field. If we take an example of wearable devices such as fitness bands, It includes fields like programming field, biomedical field, electronics field, automation field and many more. Researchers are trying to elevate that standard to make it more accurate. To make it more accurate, researchers will have to look at all fields. If they are restricted to only electronics field to minimize losses and neglect to program it in a more advanced way, that will not improve overall output.
Also if we take another example of research in Green Building Technology, It is a field which includes a wide range of fields. There are possibilities that their assumptions prove wrong. Suppose, they have considered a quality of soil to be perfect for a building but other materials used make it adulterated, they might have solutions to solve the problem. Which will lead them to discover a new field of study to make their project a success.
In conclusion, researchers should not restrict them up to their specialized fields and consider each field which affects their desired output as a great opportunity to learn and contribute. That will enhance their results and society will get better innovations.
- GRE Argument:The following appeared in a memo from the mayor of Brindleburg to the city council."Two years ago, the town of Seaside Vista opened a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. Since then, the Seaside Vista Tourism Board has reported a 20% i 12
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 50
- Argument EssayIn recent years, Braeburn Corporation has seen lagging sales of its food products. Just a few of the many food products Braeburn sells are soy products.Soy products have been shown to reduce rates of cancer. Because people care about reducin 33
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for 50
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company."When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited 23
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 515, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...igned and desired one. I agree with the authors statement. If we take an example of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... I agree with the authors statement. If we take an example of Internet of Thing...
^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct to program it in a more advanced way, that will not improve overall output. ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hat will not improve overall output. Also if we take another example of research ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ht have solutions to solve the problem. Which will lead them to discover a new field ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96594427245 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81381060504 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501547987616 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1038800992 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159682999251 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054682857162 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347715644303 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109463648998 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131623152022 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.