Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
During our life time we will run into people who have similar and different points of views as compared to our own. At times, we will have either someone who holds similar views to our own in regards to certain topics be responsible for teaching us, and other times those responsible for teaching us will hold different views from us when it comes to certain topics. I will provide two examples explaining why I mostly disagree with the statement that we typically learn more from people that have similar views, because being taught by someone who has views that contradict my own can lead to disagreement that initiates stress which will inhibit learning.
To start off, mathematical subjects, such as algebra, geometry, and calculus are very concrete topics and either have a right or wrong answer. There are no “gray areas” in regards to a correct answer when it comes to those topics. Therefore, there is very little room or disagreement to be unresolved. The fact that mathematics is “black and white, and with no gray area,” allows for those with different views to come to the same conclusion regardless of the stress levels caused by disagreement.
Physics is another field of study that is very concrete in regards to what is correct and what is not correct. Newton’s Laws of Motion will always be the same no matter what country or planet the student and teacher are on. If a student believed that the sky is green and the grass is blue, and gravity varies from time to time. A physics teacher who believes that the grass is green and the sky is blue, will be able to teach the student that gravity is constant on Earth using Newton’s Laws of Motion, regardless that they both disagree about the color of the sky and grass. The disagreement about the color of the sky and grass will not inhibit the student’s learning about gravity regardless of the amount of stress caused by the student’s and teacher’s disagreement.
However, some subjects can in fact be opaque when it comes to getting a correct answer. History can vary in how it is studied and retold depending on who is teaching it and his or her views on the historical topic. John F. Kennedy is a polarizing political figure, and can lead to disagreement in and outside the classroom. A teacher may have liberal points of views that line up with John F. Kennedy’s political beliefs; which may cause him to teach favorably about John F. Kennedy. A student in this teacher’s classroom may have conservative beliefs, and believe John F. Kennedy to be a terrible president. This can lead to disagreement when the teacher covers John F. Kennedy in class, that could lead to friction between the student and teacher. The friction will lead to stress that negatively impacts the learning environment in a manner that inhibits learning for those present.
Overall, it is a very complicated issue in regards to how efficient we learn from those with similar and different views from our own, and if the friction from the disagreements causes stress the inhibits learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | RIYA MODI | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | okazaki11 | 62 | view |
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 59
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving 68
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
During our life time we will run into people who have simila...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...eone who holds similar views to our own in regards to certain topics be responsible for teach...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...wrong answer. There are no “gray areas” in regards to a correct answer when it comes to those...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...er field of study that is very concrete in regards to what is correct and what is not correct...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 41, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...Overall, it is a very complicated issue in regards to how efficient we learn from those with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2540.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8380952381 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64334976104 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.419047619048 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 757.8 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5125579832 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.434782609 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8260869565 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13043478261 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258703266621 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703797389282 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838789490257 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167014311059 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109520183335 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.