Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Learning is one of the most important phase through which almost everyone passes. It not only helps a person in stabilizing mentality but also in burgeoning knowledge. If a person is erudite and works at elite position of any corporation's is definitely a person who is capable of solving every problem corporation faces in due amount of time only on the basis of knowledge which is specifically earned through learning. Learning helps in innovation which eventually helps in solving problems faced in daily basis. Obviously, one gets recognized as smart, erudite, person of respective space of business or science.
Even in history we can find evidence of rivalry which lead to discovery of solution which exists till the date. For example, Thomas Edison vs Nikola Tesla, both are recognized as great inventor of 20th century. This rivalry of solving of crazy invention which solved the problem of electricity transmission. Tesla, invented AC i.e. alternating current just to solve the problem of transmission. Somehow, the intuitive mind lead to invention of solution which exist till date is widely used.
Same thing can be observed in case of India and Pakistan which are enemies of each other. Being enemy does matter but making country recognized on international level with huge infrastructure and high rate of development matters the same occur with India. Today, India is leading world on various aspects like technology, space exploration, manufacturing and much more. While Pakistan is on verge of bankruptcy and is seeking loan from various organizations and countries. In this example view of Pakistan contradict with India but instead of working on negative side it helped in positive and one can learn from them how to keep working on our development without caring for others.
This kind of behaviour doesn't help in every aspect like Russian Federation (erstwhile USSR) and United States of America both are rivals of each other but they too collaborate on various aspects like nuclear treaty, international space station and much more. Helping each other in space exploration benefits on whole human being by getting information about foreign particles of spaces, GPS i.e. Global Positioning System and many more.
I do partially agree with the both claim and reasons as critics sometime helps in learning while collaborating helps in developing new technology and solve various problems. It totally depends on what we are trying to learn and expertise do matter in every part of problem. It not only guide us on solving problem but also on solving it efficiently with taking care of environment and human kind too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | RIYA MODI | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | okazaki11 | 62 | view |
- Government should place few restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 50
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 62
- Best test of an argument is the ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint 83
- Claim Major Policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better and perspective than do members of general public 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ing for others. This kind of behaviour doesnt help in every aspect like Russian Feder...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18309859155 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79272094279 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0028702941 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12519880779 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365264447187 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453904469568 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641809057214 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422646704117 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.