Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Learning is involved in each and every stage of life. We learn not only from our teachers but also from our surrounding and people around us. People who have role in our lifes are the one who teaches us the most rather it be good or bad. But, it is not always necessary that our view goes in hand in hand with other people. Sometimes, we can learn much more from the people with whom we share no common views than the ones we have no contradiction of views.
Firstly, thinking that we can learn more from people sharing same ideology can stop us from growing. As we are creating a bubble around us and we are afraid to pop it and face the reality. But, once we try to encounter, understand and analyse whether the contradicting views have a valid point or not it will indeed benefit us. For instance, while playing cricket some players may think they know everything and would not listen to their coach as their views are clashing. Such attitude is reflected through their wrong and poor gameplay. Thus, if they tried to understand their coach's strategy they would have performed well.
Furthermore, some people have an opinion that having disagreement causes stress and inhibit learning. But, this completely depends on the how we pursue the difference in the views. If, we are ready to keep our ego aside and give the person a chance to explain their view, maybe we can understand without any stress. The best way to elaborate is the difference of views between boss and employee. If, an employee listens to the opinions of what boss is saying with a positive approach, surely it will benefit him or her. However, if the employee thinks that the boss is doing it on purpose and have a negative approach towards the view it will cause stress and also inhibit learning. This will in turn ihibit growth.
Lastly, yes sometimes it can be tiring and difficult to keep abreast with people having contradicting views. Nevertheless, we should not restrict ourselves with people sharing same views as they can never lead to our growth both as a person as well as in professional life. So, in my opinion if a we have a postive attitude then we can learn more from people having different views.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
2023-09-24 | RIYA MODI | 50 | view |
2023-08-13 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
2023-08-11 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
2023-07-21 | okazaki11 | 62 | view |
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Task 1 The diagram below shows the production of steam using a gas cooled nuclear reactor Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 58
- Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...e one who teaches us the most rather it be good or bad. But, it is not always nece...
^^
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in hand'.
Suggestion: in hand
...not always necessary that our view goes in hand in hand with other people. Sometimes, we can le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...rning. But, this completely depends on the how we pursue the difference in the views. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'we'?
Suggestion: a; we
...professional life. So, in my opinion if a we have a postive attitude then we can lea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62051282051 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44404037064 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510256410256 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.646622982 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8095238095 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04761904762 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334752381869 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104258954812 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988298821304 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226868651796 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584211021375 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.