Conformity almost always leads to a deadenig of individual creativity and energy.
The writer contends that conformity almost always leads to the deadening of the individual creativity and energy. I mostly agree with the author's assertion. However, in some cases, accordance encourages imagination rather than collapse it.
First of all, when two persons disagree with the proof of mathematical conundrum, they are forced to think in a different way inorder to establish their point of view. consequently, the discord catalze inventiveness among them. For example, while I was in a highschool, a problem related to trigonometry created diagreement of the verification process between us. Then, we were involved in a race to formulate the convincing proof. As a result, after few days, one of my friend proved it in a very acute method. For another instance, during the University time, a collegue of mine says, the proof provided by the book about a problem is not correct. All collegues were not agreed, later all were started trying to favour their point right. As a result, all were busy with proving it. Finally, there were so many methods created.
Secondly, when we usually engages in a political debate, disagreement often triggers us to think properly in order to show our side is valid. For instance, we often see in an American political debate, one is usuallly try to say that they are indeed a best candidate, in order to prove so, they presents various their point of views. consequently, they become creative glaringly. In case of myself, once I used to be very retiring, I barely engages in a debate, but as time passed, I started engaging in various debates, later I found myself that mine creativity has significantly rosed.
Third of all, this might not be true in all the situation, sometimes, agreement leads us to more creative . For example, suppose two persons of different fields are having debate, what do you think in this case, in my point in this case, the debate couldn't be fruitful.
In sum, I agree wtih the writer's contention casewise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-06 | Sudan Devkota | 50 | view |
| 2021-02-06 | Sudan Devkota | 16 | view |
| 2021-01-22 | Chikuwa | 54 | view |
| 2021-01-22 | mama | 54 | view |
| 2020-11-23 | sana740 | 16 | view |
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its heroines 50
- The technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 62
- The technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 54
- Technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 50
- Last October the city of Belleville installed high intensity lighting in its central business district and vandalism there declined within a month The city of Amburg has recently begun police patrols on bicycles in its business district but the rate of va 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ity and energy. I mostly agree with the authors assertion. However, in some cases, acco...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cal conundrum, they are forced to think in a different way inorder to establish their point of vie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...order to establish their point of view. consequently, the discord catalze inventiveness amon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'engage'
Suggestion: engage
...s created. Secondly, when we usually engages in a political debate, disagreement oft...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...suallly try to say that they are indeed a best candidate, in order to prove so, t...
^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'present'
Suggestion: present
...t candidate, in order to prove so, they presents various their point of views. consequen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
... presents various their point of views. consequently, they become creative glaringly. In cas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'engage'
Suggestion: engage
...ce I used to be very retiring, I barely engages in a debate, but as time passed, I star...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mes, agreement leads us to more creative . For example, suppose two persons of dif...
^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e, in my point in this case, the debate couldnt be fruitful. In sum, I agree wtih the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... be fruitful. In sum, I agree wtih the writers contention casewise.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, while, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98203592814 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80217908397 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7431328831 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5789473684 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104921014842 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385138518686 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114861817951 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760105512558 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108263068642 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.