Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
statement inasmuch as deep learning is necessary in any field to do critical judgement. An expert of particular field have knowledge to think about it from different perspective rather than the inexperienced on this field. But it is not true for all time that to do critical judgement, need to be an expert on this field. Sometimes unexpert can produce an unique and effective solution.
One compelling argument in favor of my position is, to do critical thinking on a particular topic , anyone need to sufficient knowledge on this area. Without proper knowledge, it is hard to think critically. So any judgement from the expert will obviously more valuable rather than others judgement. For example, to think critically on the formula of medicine, must have to expert on pharmacy or medicine and relevant field. So a critical judgement that will come from the person who is expert on this will obviously be valuable than from the others field.
Second argument is an expert has the thinking ability from different sights to evaluate and comment on somethings. An unexpert are more likely have not sufficient amount of knowledge to understand the mechanism of this. So it is humorous to comment or judge critically for this unexpert person. For example, in the field of power and energy, a medicine expert can not judge critically or his judgement is less likely be accepted universally rather than an electrical engineer or the expert on the particular field.
Moreover, critical judgement in any field is to think differently to solve a particular problem or to change somethings that will more effective. To do this, an expert is needed because he has practical experience on this can know about the mechanism properly. unexpert or less known person have superficial knowledge on this is not enough to thik about this properly. So it is simple that this judgement will less evaluate.
However, in some fields, an unexpert judgment can play a crucial role to solve the problems. For example, in graphic design sector, an unexpert can judge how look like the poster or user interface is. Sometimes he can judge more accurately than the expert and this different perspective judgement play a vital role to make the design more attractive and user-friendly. Additionally, an unexpert can think from the common and ubiquitous perspective have play a crucial role to make this more accepted.
In conclusion, although critical judgement are depend on the expertise value on the particular field, sometimes unexpetise or common judgement also can play a vital role. So, to make the idea more accurate and accepted everyone's judgement have to care. It is true that the expert critical judgement will get more value but common ground judgement will need to be evaluated carefully.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-22 | Zahid6400 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | wopona8219 | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
- The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 50
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning 75
- It is a good thing if senior management workers in a company get a much higher salary than other workers in the same company Do you agree or disagree 56
- The bar graph below outlines literacy rates for a number of nations in 200 Write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown here 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Statement
statement inasmuch as deep learning is necessary ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s field. Sometimes unexpert can produce an unique and effective solution. One com...
^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... critical thinking on a particular topic , anyone need to sufficient knowledge on ...
^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unexpert
... can know about the mechanism properly. unexpert or less known person have superficial k...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 48, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...lusion, although critical judgement are depend on the expertise value on the particula...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06550218341 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82091079249 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.390829694323 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9701774423 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258566925925 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927992146377 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792283131834 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168684205575 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841667207744 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.