Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
To reach to a conclusion is always the purpose of any discussion. Though not always possible, some discussions remain unconcluded in the end. Discussing controversial topics with those having contrasted views is useful and necessary since the actual discussion will follow only when contrasting parties will prove others to be wrong and a conclusion will be made. But strong and adamant views of opposite parties may sometimes leave discussion unconcluded.
Considering that people on contrasting parties will not change their minds, it is true that the discussion would lead to a false conclusion in some cases. This is because rather than discussing what is right and what is wrong, parties will actually become more self assertive neglecting the facts, evidences and other's point of view. Rather based on theory made by their core believes, they would not accept or try to think of the other side of the view.
But, again not having people with contrasting views on any discussion will inherently qualify the discussion to be biased on one side. For instance, if a law is passed after discussion by a commitee consisting of members only supporting a particular scenario and no one to challange it, the law will get implemented without consideration of its negative effects on the society. An example of this can be seen in real world itself when pandemic started, discussions led to imposing lockdowns in countries. But no one was aware of the unprecedented problems that actually rose afterwards.By increasing the percentage of people supporting the contrasting views, the decision of lockdown may have been reverted or postponed. Thus it can be concluded that even though people may not seem to change their core beliefs afterall, but surely the conclusion of any discussion will get affected and inliclined more towards one of the parties.
In conclusion, absence of people having contrasting views will make the dicussion biased, but on the other hand having people with contrasting views may leave discussion unconcluded. Hence it is ambigious to state whether there should or should not be antithetical people involved in a discussion
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ts, evidences and others point of view. Rather based on theory made by their core beli...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
... problems that actually rose afterwards.By increasing the percentage of people sup...
^^
Line 5, column 722, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...wn may have been reverted or postponed. Thus it can be concluded that even though pe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 813, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
...y not seem to change their core beliefs afterall, but surely the conclusion of any discu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...views may leave discussion unconcluded. Hence it is ambigious to state whether there ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2225433526 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92230262828 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0434429541 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.071428571 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305575662126 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111012313529 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732395601215 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201137832374 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241062216237 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.