Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Some people think that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
However, the aim of an educational institution is to help students to achieve their goals. Although it is common that educational institutions would guide their students to figure out what they want, discouraging them from the fields of study which they are unlikely to succeed are not logical.
First of all, educational institutions do not have right to influence or change the mind of their students. Their students have freedom to choose what they want to learn and what they want to choose to be their future careers. Educational institutions could improve their courses to give their students more detailed information before they choose one field but not just dissuade them by their judgments.
Secondly, how could educational institution correctly judge one student would be successful in this field or not. They can not base on some common sense or stereotype. They might think a person with only one leg can not be successful in running, but so many people in special Olympic Games disapprove it. They might think that girls can not be really successful in Math based on the stereotype that boys have more talent in math, but Hypatia is one of the most famous women mathematicians. So there is no formula or theory to let educational institutions to know who would be successful in one field or not.
Moreover, if educational institutions dissuade students from pursuing the fields of study in which they are not likely to succeed, it would also decrease the reputations of educational institutions. Because if one educational institution could cultivate a student become a successful person in the field they are not likely to succeed, it not only show the ambitions that student has, it also proves the great quality of the education in that school and also the atmosphere of freedom in that school.
Admittedly, there are also some advantages to implementing this policy. It can somehow stop their students to make wrong choices for their entire life. If you do not have talent in art, you can not compromise it by just being super diligent. Some many artists spend their whole life in a tiny dirty basement keeping drawing every day and night, but could never see their works are exhibited in a gallery.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weathe 50
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 58
- "For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the symphony's concerts-in-the-park series doubled. The symp 50
- Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Others believe that universities should not force students to take any courses other than those that will help prepare th 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in special Olympic Games disapprove it. They might think that girls can not be reall...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.188679245283 0.240241500013 79% => OK
Verbs: 0.181603773585 0.157235817809 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0801886792453 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0801886792453 0.0497285424764 161% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0801886792453 0.0444667217837 180% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.10141509434 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0259433962264 0.0406280797675 64% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76390695088 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0400943396226 0.030933414821 130% => OK
Particles: 0.00235849056604 0.0016655270985 142% => OK
Determiners: 0.0683962264151 0.0997080785238 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0377358490566 0.0249443105267 151% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0212264150943 0.0148568991511 143% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2376.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 394.0 452.878318584 87% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03045685279 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.319796954315 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243654822335 0.280924506359 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187817258883 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121827411168 0.132149295362 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76390695088 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 219.290929204 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456852791878 0.48968727796 93% => OK
Word variations: 48.5191886696 55.4138127331 88% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1764705882 23.380412469 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8988767217 59.4972553346 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.764705882 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 23.380412469 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.674092028746 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 47.5419528217 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 0.924137931034 1.64882698954 56% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464409816632 0.391690518653 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.148787470614 0.123202303941 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0923992242043 0.077325440228 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.624431121945 0.547984918172 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180523204779 0.149214159877 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197859211016 0.161403998019 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.213708644039 0.0892212321368 240% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.316532974936 0.385218514788 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.113452641923 0.0692045440612 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351584291072 0.275328986314 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.242435435598 0.0653680567796 371% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.