Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
The issue above suggests that the government officials should persue their own judgment rather than following the public's will without any considerations. Some might think that since the officials are nominated by the candidates they elected or elected directly by the public, it is necessary to follow the public's will. However, as the government officials are obliged to do their best to make better government, it is important to make the most probable choice to benefit the government rather than following the public's will. Therefore, I agree with the assertion above.
Admittedly, most of the government officials are closely related to the people they serve. They are either nominated by the people who are elected by votes or elected directly by the public. As a result, it seems like a common sence to follow the demotic will. Moreover, since the government is representatives of the public, it is almost obligatory to follow the wills of the public.
However, even with these close relationships between government officials and the individuals of the country, there were several examples in the history that doing so did not go well. We can see this example in the case of Argentina, where the government followed the public wills without any contemplation. The result led to today's devastating inflation in Argentina that many people suffer from daunting prices of everyday products. Moreover, in the case of Venesuela, the result became more harsh than the case of Argentina. Today, Venesuela's economy had become a calamity resulted by the government unquestioningly following the people's will.
As a matter of fact, government officials tend to have more information than the public. They have numerous ways to get in touch with these valuable information that the public can not get access to it. Thus, most of the officials tend to be specialists in that specific field, and therefore have the exact expertise to make more beneficial choice than ordinary people. Even with these choices does not match the public's will the officials should follow their perspective because the probability of the official's choice might be more beneficial than the public's choice.
In conclusion, the government officials should follow their judgment. Even though they are closely related to the public, this does not mean that they have to follow the unprobable public will. Moreover, there are several cases in the past that following only the public will resulted a catastrophy for all. Therefore, since the officials have keen ability to make better choices than the public, they should follow their own judgment.
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Three years ago because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve 100 lions and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve an area that is home to most of the s 55
- An ancient traditional remedy for insomnia the scent of lavender flowers has now been proved effective In a recent study 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender scented pillows in a controlled room where their slee 60
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction c 60
- If the government is somewhat underfunded economically which part or two of the city could be cut Reduce the redundancy of personnel in the city hall Replace the plants that require frequent maintenance in the park lawn with plants that do not require fre 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people should always tell the truth
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22327790974 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76576985801 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429928741093 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0753023252 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0476190476 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324531991976 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122421529971 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991200273651 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213392820823 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664328551059 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.