Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government officials are appointed to maintain peace in society and work for the welfare of the people, but they should not be subject to being bossed around by individuals. Instead, they should cooperate with each other and consider the overall welfare of society. The prompt suggests that government officials should depend on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly following the will of the people they serve. I partially agree with this prompt for the following reasons.
Government officials are entrusted with their positions and power to work for the betterment of the people they serve, considering the welfare of the entire population. People's will, on the other hand, can be subjective and divided. In cases where people's opinions are divided, if government officials were to only follow the will of the people, chaos could ensue in society. Therefore, government officials must make decisions that balance the overall welfare and future of the society, without getting swayed by individual wills.
However, it is crucial for government officials to think from the people's point of view and find a middle ground between people's will and better decisions for society. If government officials only consider their own perspective and judge situations accordingly, their decisions may fail to address the needs of the people and, in some cases, harm them. For instance, if a government official who does not live near a river believes that building a bridge over that river will bring prosperity to the area, they may not take into consideration the potential consequences faced by the local residents, leading to destructive outcomes.
Furthermore, blindly depending on the judgment of government officials can increase corruption. As intermediaries between the people and the government, officials have a responsibility to consider the needs of the people. If officials disregard these needs, the voices of the people will go unheard, allowing for corruption to flourish. Some corrupt officials may collude with powerful individuals to further their own agendas and neglect the welfare of the people they were appointed to serve. This would result in the suffering of the people who were supposed to be brought peace by these officials.
In conclusion, it is not a matter of government officials only following their own judgment or unquestioningly adhering to the will of the people. Rather, a balance must be struck between the two. The primary goal of government officials should always be the welfare of the people and society, without any selfish motives. By maintaining this balance, society can avoid chaos and move towards a state of peace and prosperity.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35377358491 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87675527237 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464622641509 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0760217715 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265262709735 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980018167767 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704059518187 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178029571053 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388385252074 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.