Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
The question of whether government should fund artistic works, or whether the involvement of government would hinder the integrity of artistic expressions has sparked a considerable debate. I believe a balanced approach should be taken so that artistic talents can flourish and the creative flow of an artist is not also hampered.
First and Foremost, government funding in arts can bring financial stability in this sector which will help an artist to think more creatively without getting interrupted by materialistic needs. Also there are many organizations which struggle and fail to support their artists properly due to financial limitations. The involvement of government may help arts to flourish and gift the world with many more innovative works.
Moreover, there are many talented and undiscovered artists who has to leave this field due to financial inability, can be supported by government funds and one of the supposedly lost talent can be revived and presented to the world as a nation's pride. Due to such funding many talent hunting programs can be arranged by organizations to find new artistic who are capable to make a great contribution to arts.
Therefore, fundings provided by the government can be used to arrange large programs which will be open to broader audience resulting into enabling the general people to enjoy the creative innovation done by the artists. That's how arts will not be confined to an elite group rather open to all, resulting in building a sophisticated and cohesive society.
However, government funding can be very helpful in flourishing arts but it can have some negative consequences such as political agenda can pushed through such events. So, it is very important to keep some limitations in to which extent the government fund will be able to influence the artistic expressions. The creativity of the artists should be controlled by any group of people.
Also, the secured funding can bring a feeling of extreme stability into organizations and artists that they can lose their interest in innovation. So, dependency on other private groups or organizations are also essential rather getting all necessary support from government. This will keep their urge to strive alive in as they would be not be able to take the funds for granted.
In conclusion, government funds should be provided to flourish the arts but a regulation is needed to ensure that the fund is utilized properly. Funding should not impact the creativity of the artists. A proper balance can result to open the art to all and let artists shine without any additional burdens.
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether government should fund artistic works, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ing interrupted by materialistic needs. Also there are many organizations which stru...
^^^^
Line 8, column 222, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...reative innovation done by the artists. Thats how arts will not be confined to an eli...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18912529551 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89170427673 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48463356974 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4692883171 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.944444444 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378218465325 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127705270115 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822645488773 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200019520697 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755025024515 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.