Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In a democratic country like India, where the government is of the people, by the people and for the people, it is crucial to take into consideration the will of the people. Whether this holds for all the issues of all the individuals is debatable and a clear cut decision can be made only after analysis.
If a government official is elected, he must be suitable for the task he’s chosen for. He must possess some qualities that he could make it to the position he holds today. So, he relying on his own judgment seems completely justified. Like it’s said with experience come wisdom, and these officials only become wiser with years of experience in dealing with people’s problems. People’s will and demands are not always pragmatic. It is at such times, that their own judgment proves to be sounder than the masses illegitimate demands. Also there are times when different groups of people present completely opposite desires. It is not practically feasible for a government official to take into account the will of every individual. Here again, it’s the best for the official to rely on his judgment. Another point to be taken care of is that not always do these will of people abide by the country’s laws. Under such circumstances, an official must make a decision based on his prior experience and knowledge.
But there are loopholes to this too. There are times when the legitimate demands of the masses go unheard. The government officials too are humans and so can make errors. There are times when the laws need to be reformed and for an official, abiding by the laws won’t be a just thing to do. In such a scenario, it is important that the will of the people be heard. If not accepted as it is, it must at least be considered before coming to any conclusion.
To sum up, government officials are wise enough to make a judgment based on their past experiences but completely ignoring the will of the people won’t be fair on their part.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
2019-08-26 | Harsha98 | 50 | view |
2019-08-20 | shiki | 66 | view |
2019-07-24 | Gh.Ne | 66 | view |
2019-06-20 | isaackoshy | 33 | view |
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 80
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 75
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 40
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim 57
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 347 350
No. of Characters: 1571 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.316 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.527 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.546 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 97 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.35 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.894 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.35 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.451 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5