Education is the utmost important thing in the standards of current living. Even the growth of a country someway depends upon the percentage of educated employees. As government plays a huge role in defining the journey of growth of a country or a provision, developing a suitable plan for education considering the diversity in income, living standards, etc, sounds a troublesome task. Our issue here for government to provide free education in the college and university is considerably a huge matter of debate. My views have supporting as well as contradicting points and I prefer to go with a judiciary approach based on particular factors.
Cost of living has one of the sky-rising trend in current scenario. An article from a survey suggests that the cost of growing up a child till 20 years will cost more than a crore(INR). An unaffordable number for an abundant population of this world. A dominating proportion of this amount belongs to the education cost starting from play school till university. Considering more than 50% of current population as a middle class with just required income, providing education to an individual is near to an impossible task. If government supports people with providing free education, this population can build a better future ahead of them which is going to benefit themselves, their family and ultimately to the country too.
The other way around, the rising inflation rates and cost of education will add up a significant expense on the government too. For matching the standards of the rising technologies and teaching methodologies, the charges incorporated for educating an individual will be a fortune. Considering the population, we actually are expecting government to boil up all the oil-selling profits, if there any. Since a few european countries provides free education in government-based colleges and universities, a rough stats claims the costs covers more than 50% of the economic plan. So, making it obvious, not all the countries are capable of providing such facilities to their people.
A solution of this issue would be making a trade-off between providing a free or cost effective education to unaffordable people and let the affordable population pay the required. An effective way would be dividing the population into categories of high, optimum and low income, where the subcidy will be in percentages of 0%, 50-60% and free respectively. This will lead less burden to the government based on education cost along with providing a good quality education to the significant population. This may cause some conflict of interest with people paying more feel a partiality against the others. Since the cause behind this has more on ethical and moral aspects, defining the same to the conflicting parties and spreading awareness with good quality of education can counter these on a longer term.
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 83
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own 58
- Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, may, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2409.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2030237581 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03808699963 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516198704104 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7656533385 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0476190476 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141144847983 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459557555625 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358595339937 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957363013042 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285362818979 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.