We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own

Learning is a never ending process and it helps people exlpore more and more as one fascinates to. Most of the times we learn from books, web blogs, movies, series, documentries or lecturer, etc. But people we surround also share learnings and that also counts in how we behave, react and present ourselves. I tend to disregard the claim that one learns more from people whose views we share and lesser from those who contradict us because it is never certain. Also, as the reason suggests, Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learnings. I deny with the reason here too as one can gain a destructive criticism for a contradicting view and may take it as motivation to explore more and learn the deeper aspects.

Conflicting views not always serves as a matter of distress and may have different outcomes too. Consider the case of a student studying in secondary school, who had to compete his maths homework for tomorrow's class. As he got a fascianting blog about The Big Bang Theory and find himself indulge to explore the same and missed to do his homework. Since, the student find something interesting and tend to compromise his emementary homeworks, he was castigated the next day at the school. As a part of disagreement between him and school teacher, the student may consider this as learning and gain the skill of time management where he can do his homeworks as well as explore the flamboyant world of Space and Time. This way, neither the given reason nor the given claim asserts and the outcome was a win-win situation for both the conflicting parties. Adding to that, a new skill of time management in the repertoire.

One can contradict with the statement that multiple disagreements may cause distress and demotivate an individual, so the claim as well as the reason hold true. I agree, but there is a positive side of that scenario too. Gaining destructive criticism gives a kind of confidence to the individual too. That may turn him into a stoic personality where the persistency will be the key. Our history has scientists like Galileo who has 100 failures and several criticism, still he tend to be persistant and proved his final thoughts. He learned 100 ways of not dong things and ultimately slapping the criticisms. Conclusively, one can learn more from disagreements too and not always it leads to stress and inhibit learnings.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...d it helps people exlpore more and more as one fascinates to. Most of the times we...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'missed doing'.
Suggestion: missed doing
...himself indulge to explore the same and missed to do his homework. Since, the student find s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun criticism seems to be countable; consider using: 'several criticisms'.
Suggestion: several criticisms
...s like Galileo who has 100 failures and several criticism, still he tend to be persistant and pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tends'.
Suggestion: tends
...ailures and several criticism, still he tend to be persistant and proved his final t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, still, well, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85891089109 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77358857776 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534653465347 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4255797732 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.15 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268039415404 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07462356669 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10748372751 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186298378973 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179366731438 0.0667264976115 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...d it helps people exlpore more and more as one fascinates to. Most of the times we...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'missed doing'.
Suggestion: missed doing
...himself indulge to explore the same and missed to do his homework. Since, the student find s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun criticism seems to be countable; consider using: 'several criticisms'.
Suggestion: several criticisms
...s like Galileo who has 100 failures and several criticism, still he tend to be persistant and pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tends'.
Suggestion: tends
...ailures and several criticism, still he tend to be persistant and proved his final t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, still, well, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85891089109 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77358857776 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534653465347 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4255797732 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.15 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268039415404 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07462356669 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10748372751 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186298378973 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179366731438 0.0667264976115 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.