Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Without having any doubt, scientific research and development are the reasons behind the incredible achievement of human race. But imposing some restrictions on scientific research begs a question. I strongly agree with the claim that it is incumbent upon government to place certain restriction on scientific research. For, unchecked development in science and technology can bring misfortune on human race.
In the first place, development in the field of science and technology has changed the world into a village. People are exploiting modern technology for the benefit of human race; people are getting new lives due to the achievement in medical field. Aviation industries are revolutionizing the transportations. However, development in science in technology is putting the human race at risk in some sense. For example, the competition among the countries to develop nuclear weapon is risking the very human existence. So, government should impose some restriction on development of nuclear weapon. When looking at the present conflict in the world, we can easily understand that issues regarding nuclear development are causing tension among the countries like The United States, Iran and North Korea.
In the second place, it is high time that the government made regulatory provision on the development of science and technology. Before thinking about the development of certain technology, it is essential to access the ramification of such development. By way of example, research on the field of gene editing and cloning has become a controversial issue in the modern ages. Do we really want our duplicate existence in the world? Do we want genetically modified food? Unless accessing potential future complexity due to gene edition and cloning, the government should not allow the development of such technology.
Finally, some may argue that development of nuclear weapon is mandatory for the defense of the sovereignty of the country; however, the possible destruction caused by nuclear weapon does not guarantee the existence of the sovereign country either. So, in order to make the world more safer place to live, restriction upon the development of such dangerous weapon is mandatory.
In conclusion, considering the ramification of the development of certain technology, government should place few restriction on scientific research and development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- In order for any work of art, whether film, literature, sculpture, or a song to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 70
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 59
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
... either. So, in order to make the world more safer place to live, restriction upon the dev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, really, regarding, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 39.0 12.9106741573 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5564738292 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12919526924 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495867768595 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.448426187 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.85 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263905181801 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947721625152 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140215239546 0.0758088955206 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218089718471 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19313315015 0.0667264976115 289% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.