Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Science has played a vital role in the evolution of the humankind. In fact, There has never been such a large change in the development of technology and science through the last decades. The prompt recommends the government to not financially support scientific researches where consequences are not clear. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion and argue that government should fund research even if the results are uncertain for two reasons.
To begin, the researches results can never be decided as it is usually based on innovation and finding the answer that does not exist. For instance, the vaccines needed for the cure of any diseases or any virus like Swine flu which can't be made on the first attempt, the best result came after myriad of failed attempts which is researched on global scale by different organizations. If the government can fund this researches then it would be impossible to evolve through any pandemic or diseases. The above example illustrates that the security and medical system is highly fragile toward any global epidemic which can't be curb through general medical systems, if we assume that searches should not be funded, It will only exasperate the situation. it seems absurd to think that there will be no pandemic, the researches without the fund would be able to handle it in the future? Past Experience tells us that it will not.
Further, even if we assume that the research results are most probably unclear, government should still provide and invest in the scientific research as there is still possibility of effective research. For instance, if any group of scientist researching on a certain technology or project which is very difficult to perform and after numerous failed attempt they find success. Yes, there was risk of lose of resources and time if it fails but, it was also a chance to change the future because it is definitely better than not even trying. Moreover, researches in weapons which behold the security and economy of a country and also Space Exploration are the best example, in which the success is followed by failure projects, money and time. So, we can assume that not funding researches would only limit the evolution of technology, economy, security and development of country. There are also vie between the governments in the innovation of medicine, weapons and space exploration, in which one country can also prevail the other one. Thus, government should fund scientific researches even though consequences are unclear.
Of course, some argue that, adequate funds can't be provided to most researches happening in the country otherwise it would unsettle the economy. However, government should fund in most researches as it also increases the number of success, which would bring money to the country. Ignoring the researches due to lower changes would just be harmful for our own. If there is a minute chances of clarity in the research then it should be funded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | sark | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | cringelord | 79 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | cringelord | 45 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Science has played an vital role in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Science has played an vital role in the evolution of the huma...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eases or any virus like Swine flu which cant be made on the first attempt, the bes...
^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h cant be made on the first attempt, the best result came after myriad of failed ...
^^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ragile toward any global epidemic which cant be curb through general medical systems...
^^^^
Line 4, column 481, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... It will only exasperate the situation. it seems absurd to think that there will b...
^^
Line 4, column 612, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: Experience
...uld be able to handle it in the future? Past experience tells us that it will not. Furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...perience tells us that it will not. Further, even if we assume that the rese...
^^
Line 6, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the research results are most probably unclear, government should still provide...
^^
Line 6, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter than not even trying. Researches in weapons which behold the security and ec...
^^
Line 6, column 890, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'vied'.
Suggestion: vied
... development of country. There are also vie between the governments in the innovati...
^^^
Line 8, column 45, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...course, some argue that, adequate funds cant be provided to most researches happenin...
^^^^
Line 8, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...therwise it would unsettle the economy. however, government should fund in most researc...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nges would just be harmful for our own. If there is a minute chances of clarity in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, then, thus, for instance, in fact, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06339468303 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68895549219 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490797546012 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0809077394 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.904761905 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24366539551 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803781438748 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615177567042 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144172201522 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388469559704 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.