Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In devel

Essay topics:

Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

It is a well-established fact that education is critical to the growth and success of an individual. Today almost everyone yearns to educate themselves in order to have a thriving career. This makes higher education an essential step to have better chances of successful employment. But alas, the reality remains that most of the good colleges and universities (mainly government) are very expensive and not everyone can afford to enrol themselves. It would be a good step forward if the government takes some steps to make it accessible to all and providing free college education would be one of the greatest steps.

We have all kinds of people in the society with vast economic disparities between them. The costly university course structure makes it really difficult for those who are underprivileged economically to thrust themselves forward by getting access to a quality education. Offering higher education free of charge would be a game-changer. Since everyone has the right to education, I believe everyone should have equal opportunities as well. Moreover, here are so many people who due to the lack of money have not been able to work and prove themselves to their full potential. There have been many examples of students coming from the lower strata of the society who lack equal opportunities and are hence not able to fulfil their career commitments. One wonders how many great minds must have remained unrecognised due to such trivialities.

Though it might sound strange in some parts of the world, this type of policy has been adopted in Germany quite a while ago. The country offers free education to all till they have completed their college education and offers university level courses for a reasonable price. This way students are able to focus on their studies rather than constantly worrying about either paying their enormous student loans or being preoccupied with paying their equally enormous tuition fees. It has been a successful model and now students all over the world think of Germany as their eduction destination. I think all countries should take this example into consideration and apply it as soon as possible.

However, one must look at the other side of the coin as well. Even though this initiative might come with more advantages than disadvantages, it would substantially affect the revenue generation.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 nikhil40507 50 view
2020-01-04 terraventu 83 view
2019-12-27 jha 50 view
2019-12-07 Akhil_Maddukuri 54 view
2019-11-13 Apollo100 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user shimonej :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a due'.
Suggestion: who is a due
...well. Moreover, here are so many people who due to the lack of money have not been able...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, well, while, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86055469555 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567708333333 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9688937222 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.421052632 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135135289502 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442973612711 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537514694832 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759571995397 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397468349723 0.0667264976115 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.