Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some people might think that sometimes putting restriction on research projects about science is a good idea; however, I am not agreed with the recommendation because it can stop the world revolution. If science will be stopped, how the world will stick together.
First of all, science can definitely make the world better no matter what. For example, imagine scientific who have been creating Covid vaccine during past year and now. There are many examples of other vaccines for different diseases’ prevention which are for human protection. So, scientific development will usually make something beneficial.
Additionally, all of current scientific discoveries relies on past knowledges because science is like chains all connected together. Thus, academies students and teachers always need to understand and use past scientific developments to be able to create new interventions. When a registered dietitian wants to recommend a new protein supplement for a resident, he/she will rely on her previous knowledge from his/her academy learning.
However, some people might believe that in some cases research restriction is necessary which can be true sometimes. Consider a crazy scientist who wants to create duplicated humans who can exactly look like real humans. In this case, an unethical scientific activity should be stopped. Another example can be about Hiroshima atomic bomb that killed many people years ago. But even with these severe examples, we cannot blame the science because those humans who uses the science in a wrong way should be blamed.
It might be true that sometimes unrestricted scientific researches will cause more problems than benefits, but governments cannot just stop the science to prevent those problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 62
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Mer 50
- The general welfare of a nation s people is a better indication of that nation s greatness than are the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In deve 58
- A recent national survey found that the majority of workers with access to the Internet at work had used company computers for personal or recreational activities such as banking or playing games In an effort to improve our employees productivity we shoul 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 481, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cause those humans who uses the science in a wrong way should be blamed. It might be true tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 269.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50557620818 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83038571901 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3940414392 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129742911584 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457503658697 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035466743549 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735731605376 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192516973015 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.