Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
From navigating with constellations and maps to plan our travels within seconds with mobile softwares; from believing people with certain illness are simply witches to figuring out the origins of these illness lies within the intricate systems connected by billions of neurons, technology breakthroughs and insights about the world around us came from all the relentless research and development efforts from the world’s brightest minds. The prompt recommends that government should place regulations or laws on scientific investigations and development. In my view, I strongly agree that regulations are necessary while achieving these breakthroughs for two reasons.
To begin, scientific research and development is not a closed bubble, it often have massive influence on the external world. Nuclear research, for instance, have advanced between the 1960s and 1980s. Despite its past glory, nuclear research facilities have been notorious due to the way they dispose nuclear wastes, which has a detrimental effect on millions of residents and their descendants as well as the overall environmental wellbeing in that area. Research has stated that organisms that are constantly exposed to nuclear waste are two hundred percent more prone to cancer comparing to others who are not, and the permanent damage on their genes caused by radiation can result congenital malformation in their children. Countries that conducts heavy nuclear research have gathered over the year to draft and place nuanced laws and instructions on nuclear waste disposal procedures to minimize the impact on its local residents, which potentially saved millions and prevented re-enacting past tragedies. This example illustrates that regulation and laws are essential to ensure that we maximize the benefits from the technology and minimize the accompanying risks.
Further, humans are not the only ones that are involved in the progress of science, laboratory animals largely contributed to various research domains. Due to their biological proximity with humans, researchers use mice to gain insight on how our brain functions. Primates are often used for scholars to observe social behaviours. Since they cannot be vocal about their feelings in such a way that humans can understand, they are completely vulnerable for being exploited. A research that proved how mothers’ affection plays a vital role in shaping children, left un-mendable scars on the young monkeys participating in the test psychologically. These primates showed hostile and aggressive behaviour towards the others, which prevented them from integrate back into their society. For a social species, just like us, this is cruelty on another level. In recent years, governments made comprehensive changes on animal welfare laws to discourage commercial companies as well as research facilities on animal testing. Thus, it is obvious from the example that government regulations promote more ethical environment for research and development.
Of course, some may argue that restrictions can decelerate technological advancements and introduce bureaucracy into the research process. I believe, however, breakthroughs should minimize its impact. The time researchers spend filling out paperwork is trivial comparing to the time solving issues caused by unregulated researches.
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...opment is not a closed bubble, it often have massive influence on the external world...
^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rimental effect on millions of residents and their descendants as well as the ove...
^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...pletely vulnerable for being exploited. A research that proved how mothers’ affection play...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, while, for instance, of course, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2842.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75303643725 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01208384965 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589068825911 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 855.0 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.2570940011 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5238095238 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154864844121 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453639653633 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329284464152 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884177636901 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224201706108 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.1639044944 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.38706741573 126% => OK
difficult_words: 182.0 100.480337079 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.