Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The topic raises the controversial issue of whether governments should restrict scientific research and development. Indisputably, scientific research has made people's lives easier and facilitated medical research. Nevertheless, several applications of scientific research, such as animal cloning and nuclear power plants have adverse impacts on society. Therefore, I would mostly agree with the topic that the government should place few restrictions.
First of all, the authority should ban animal cloning, though it will lead to reducing several maladies, including cancer cells, tumor cells, and so on. Because it has negative consequences on human lives. For example, anyone (who has adequate money) would be able to clone someone else; as a result, criminal activities will be increased. The cloned person will easily pretend to be someone else and take advantage of this. Thus, it is pretty obvious that it behooves the government to put restrictions on this kind of research.
Furthermore, scientists are experimenting with several nuclear power plants to ensure a better life for human beings. Consequently, people and industries will get continuous power and economics will be augmented. However, it can be used in the field of war. For instance, in World War II, America utilized nuclear bombs on Japan and we all know the repercussions. If such projects are still running, the authority should ensure that these ideas cannot be used by miscreants. So, the evidence demonstrates that the government should inhibit such research experiments.
Admittedly, scientific research has a number of boons in different fields, including medical science and aerospace research. To illustrate, scientists are researching to find a solution for dealing with cancer. In this kind of research that has benefits, the government should not impose prohibitions. What is more, due to aerospace research, we will be able to know the origin of the earth and human as well. It will also help us to predict the imminent weather.
In conclusion, although scientific research and development have advantages on people's lives, the government should place few restrictions on research which can be precarious for human beings and other animals as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 83
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatl 74
- Claim Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Reason It is inappropriate and perhaps even cruel to use public resources to fund the arts when people s basic needs are not b 83
- Three years ago because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve 100 lions and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve an area that is home to most of the same species that are found in the western preserve though in larger 70
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g cancer cells, tumor cells, and so on. Because it has negative consequences on human l...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51304347826 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01391298773 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6513882826 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5714285714 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52380952381 5.21951772744 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198119129085 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620730040441 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634705576238 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133638349937 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747200499011 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.