If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Any human lives his life to achieve the desired goal. He takes big or small steps to accomplish it. Keeping this in mind, the author's statement seems agreeable. But after analyzing the other side of the coin, the statement seems to be objectionable.
A specific path needs to be followed in order to achieve the desired goal, whether it is big or small. That path may not always be straight forward. Sometimes, people need to sacrifice their comfort to achieve a particular goal. In this case, if a person surrenders himself at any stage by giving priority to comfort then that will not be reasonable. For example, Akshay Kumar, an Indian film actor, had delivered five consecutive flops at the starting of his career. If he would have given up at that stage, he would never become a well-known actor. Considering this, one may say that, if a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
There are both just as well as unjust means to accomplish a goal, but it is totally dependent on the circumstances. For instance, in India during the freedom struggle, many activists like Subash Chandra Bose, Chandrashekar Azad, Shivaram Rajguru, Bhagat Singh fought for independence without even thinking of their lives. During those, they had to use unlawful practices and even went to jail to achieve the goal of purna Swaraj. Their ways were unlawful, but looking at the big picture of purna Swaraj these seemed to be plausible and justified.
However, it is not always correct to say that any means taken to attain a goal are justifiable. Sometimes people get so frantic to attain the goal that they even lose their mind and take immoral actions that might harm society or themselves. For instance, many students cheat on exams to secure higher marks. Although by following these unfair methods it is even possible to secure the first rank, it hampers the learning process of students. Hence, the way of pursuing that position will never be justifiable. Similarly, in any case, an immoral approach to achieve any goal is not acceptable as it might affect the society or the person itself.
To sum up, it is not always justifiable to take any means to attain a worthy goal. Although an individual must recheck the consequences before following any path in order to achieve a goal, as blindly following them might lead to adverse effects on the society or the individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Hitesh2411 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife ce 53
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic Opponents 78
- In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 62
- Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ccomplish it. Keeping this in mind, the authors statement seems agreeable. But after an...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had given'?
Suggestion: had given
...ps at the starting of his career. If he would have given up at that stage, he would never become...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 641, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...orthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. There are both just as we...
^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...t are justifiable. There are both just as well as unjust means to accomplish a goal, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in any case, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83170731707 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.636413884 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1749919513 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1304347826 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8260869565 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69565217391 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342270799523 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989801875067 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15392896992 0.0758088955206 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183511822382 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101221835476 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ccomplish it. Keeping this in mind, the authors statement seems agreeable. But after an...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had given'?
Suggestion: had given
...ps at the starting of his career. If he would have given up at that stage, he would never become...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 641, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...orthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. There are both just as we...
^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...t are justifiable. There are both just as well as unjust means to accomplish a goal, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in any case, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83170731707 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.636413884 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1749919513 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1304347826 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8260869565 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69565217391 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342270799523 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989801875067 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15392896992 0.0758088955206 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183511822382 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101221835476 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.