Unequivocally, with a cursory inspection of human beings' outlooks towards the alterations in status quos in multifarious facets of their lives from the genesis of human civilizations, it can be construed that individuals have had difficulties accepting new unwelcome truths. This tendency to adhere to sometimes "perceived wisdom" has resulted from our inflexible dogmatism having been handed down from the past. Although I subscribe to this notion, I maintain that with the passage of time especially in the new age (counterculture) in which we live people are more open to acclimatizing to new truths or facts.
In the political sphere, it is worth mentioning that every either nuanced or significant amendment has sparked numerous disputations between advocates and naysayers, in as much as revoking or invoking any new laws can affect a large number of people's lives. In this regard, powerful figures who have seen their power, properties at the risk have felt uncomfortable and utilized their status to confront changes. To illustrate, an astute politician paved the way for elimination of the slavery system in the US, Abraham Lincoln had some detractors--the republican hardliners--regarding his fundamental alterations in politics. Although he is now revered as a national hero for the fact that he was the architect of new democratic policy and modernized economy, his rules and speeches did not correspond to the interests of the most influential people, which led to his assassination.
In the social realm more precisely in the equity among men and women, women were traditionally believed to be less than men in every aspect, namely the right to vote, the right to work, have the same remunerations as men, the right to be candidate, the custody of their children, the education, and so on. Unfortunately, this perspective was ingrained into all but the handful number of open-minded women and men (like Anne Kenney and Christabel Pank) in the last decades of the 18th century who put themselves to the utmost to retrieve women's right and abolish the sex discrimination (gender inequality, disparity).This dramatic change and its consequential upshots, not surprisingly, had a large number of opponents, but with liberals perpetual effort and devotion detractors resigned. So women would not have the opportunity to exude their latent talent in various fields but for broad-minded people having led (heralded?) the way for them.
In the scientific domain, it goes without saying that we would not have convenient access to the multitude of novel technologies but for perpetual efforts and devotion of a handful number of eminent scientists in conjunction with noted entrepreneurs who have not been restricted to so-called "accepted wisdom". In other words, every development of our today's lives should be beholden to outstanding geniuses having stood against the public belief. Take Galileo, an Italian polymath, as a notable example whose impressive research outcomes provoked contentious controversies among Inquisition--a Roman Catholic organization that condemned people with unacceptable religious beliefs. Since he believed that the Sun, not the Earth was the center of the universe, on the contrary to the conviction of the populace of that era who were of the opinion that due to Galileo's contention they had to encounter divine torment. Had he not remained steadfast, we would not have passed the transition from natural philosophy to modern science, which is the foundation of all new sciences which are at the vanguard nowadays.
Nonetheless, as time goes by with the arrival of new technologies, the weird, wired world where we live has changed, as have individuals' mindsets. In doing so, nations are more likely to adapt themselves to the new twists compared to what they already believed as a true fact. Consider such disputable issues as same-sex marriage, surrogacy, and transgender surgery (sex reassignment surgery), had they been issued one century ago, many more detractors would have had in comparison with now.
To sum up, given the foregoing explanations of emergence of new truths in our lives, I, undoubtedly, deem that changes in "accepted wisdom of earlier times" have been difficult for people to be convinced. As they perceive their beliefs, thoughts, positions as well as their properties in the jeopardy. Meanwhile, the differences between humankinds’ outlooks with their ancestors' should not be neglected in view of the fact that today's public do not possess dogmatic and restricted views towards popping up new facts.
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time. 16
- Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moral behavior cannot be legislated. 75
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the 55
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ing or invoking any new laws can affect a large number of peoples lives. In this regard, powerful...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople, which led to his assassination. In the social realm more precisely in th...
^^^
Line 6, column 613, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...rimination gender inequality, disparity.This dramatic change and its consequential u...
^^^^
Line 6, column 687, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...quential upshots, not surprisingly, had a large number of opponents, but with liberals perpetual ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 921, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...road-minded people having led heralded? the way for them. In the scientific doma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, nonetheless, regarding, so, well, while, as well as, in other words, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 108.0 58.6224719101 184% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3889.0 2235.4752809 174% => OK
No of words: 719.0 442.535393258 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40890125174 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.17824056563 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20478805112 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 391.0 215.323595506 182% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543810848401 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 1210.5 704.065955056 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.8367894305 60.3974514979 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.772727273 118.986275619 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6818181818 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.056142109961 0.243740707755 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0178240241281 0.0831039109588 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301567817266 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0343009365472 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267050774673 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.38706741573 125% => OK
difficult_words: 240.0 100.480337079 239% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.